Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Authorship (2)
- Activities (1)
- Author (1)
- Compiler (1)
- Computer (1)
-
- Constitutional justifications (1)
- Copyright law (1)
- Copyrights (1)
- Creative (1)
- Creativity machine (1)
- Creator (1)
- Federal (1)
- Internet (1)
- Inventor (1)
- Legal System (1)
- Neural network (1)
- Object code (1)
- Patent Law (1)
- Patent law (1)
- Program (1)
- Protection (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Rights (1)
- Useful Arts (1)
- Work (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law
Computer Ram 'Copies:' Hit Or Myth? Historical Perspectives On Caching As A Microcosm Of Current Copyright Concerns, I. Trotter Hardy
Computer Ram 'Copies:' Hit Or Myth? Historical Perspectives On Caching As A Microcosm Of Current Copyright Concerns, I. Trotter Hardy
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Response To David Nimmer, ‘Copyright In The Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship And Originality’, Martha Woodmansee
Response To David Nimmer, ‘Copyright In The Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship And Originality’, Martha Woodmansee
Faculty Publications
Response to David Nimmer's article "Authorship and Originality."
On The Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity, Martha Woodmansee
On The Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity, Martha Woodmansee
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Intellectual Property In The Era Of The Creative Computer Program, Ralph D. Clifford
Intellectual Property In The Era Of The Creative Computer Program, Ralph D. Clifford
Faculty Publications
Computer scientists, using artificial intelligence techniques such as neural networks, are enabling computers to independently create works that appear to qualify for federal intellectual property protection. In at least one case, the creator of this kind of program has registered its output, a series of musical compositions, under his name as author with United States Copyright Office. Whether the output of the computer satisfies the statutory and constitutional requisites for protection is questionable, however. The author of this Article argues that the output of an autonomously creative computer program cannot be protected under the current copyright and patent laws. Further, …
Legitimacy And The Useful Arts, Craig Allen Nard
Legitimacy And The Useful Arts, Craig Allen Nard
Faculty Publications
The fundamental question this Article addresses is who should be primarily responsible for making patent validity determinations: the courts5 or the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”)?6 Which entity *517 would best serve the constitutional goal of promoting the progress of the useful arts?