Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Intellectual Property Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

Inc.

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Intellectual Property Law

Intellectual Property - Copyright & Internet Law - "The Big Chill": The Supreme Court Adopts An Inducement Standard For Third-Party Copyright Infringement Liability, Leaving Innovation In The Cold Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. V. Grokster, Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005)., Darrin Keith Henning Oct 2006

Intellectual Property - Copyright & Internet Law - "The Big Chill": The Supreme Court Adopts An Inducement Standard For Third-Party Copyright Infringement Liability, Leaving Innovation In The Cold Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. V. Grokster, Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005)., Darrin Keith Henning

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

A key feature of an effective copyright system is to provide protection against infringement that is consistent with a copyright's goal: to "promote . . . useful Arts." Thus, for the overall public good, it is vital to achieve a proper balance between protecting authors' works as an incentive to create and the public's interest in accessing both creative works and new technology. The outcome of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (Grosker III) and the resulting business and legal developments created ambiguity and doubt regarding potential liability in the copyright system that is having a deleterious effect on technical …


Intellectual Property Trademark Law—Victor/Victoria?—The United States Supreme Court Requires Trademark Dilution Plaintiffs To Show Actual Harm. Mosely V. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), Stephanie Egner Jan 2004

Intellectual Property Trademark Law—Victor/Victoria?—The United States Supreme Court Requires Trademark Dilution Plaintiffs To Show Actual Harm. Mosely V. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003), Stephanie Egner

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.