Intellectual Property Law Commons^™

Rankings, Reductionism, And Responsibility, Frank Pasquale

Frank A. Pasquale

After discussing how search engines operate, and sketching a normative basis for regulation of the rankings they generate, this piece proposes some minor, non-intrusive legal remedies for those who claim that they are harmed by search engine results. Such harms include unwanted (but high-ranking) results relating to them, or exclusion from high-ranking results they claim they are due to appear on. In the first case (deemed inclusion harm), I propose a right not to suppress the results, but merely to add an asterisk to the hyperlink directing web users to them, which would lead to the complainant's own comment on …

Determining The Scope Of Trademark Rights By Recourse To Value Judgements Related To The Effectiveness Of Competition - The Demise Of The Trademark-Use Requirement And The Functional Analysis Of Trademark Law, Apostolos Chronopoulos

Apostolos Chronopoulos

This paper examines the doctrinal implications of the principle of complementarity between intellectual property rights and competition law in the field of trademarks. The systematic adherence of trademark rights to the wider set of norms regulating the competitive process implies that their teleology should take into consideration value judgements related to the effectiveness of competition. Neither the limiting concept of trademark use nor the legal recognition of some “economic trademark functions” is apt to fulfil this legal task. It is therefore submitted that the normative valuations flowing out of competition law should be implemented through a purposive interpretation of the …

D Is For Digitize: An Introduction, James Grimmelmann

James Grimmelmann

This brief introductory essay reviews the history of D is for Digitize conference on the Google Books settlement and provides an overview of the seven articles in the symposium issue.

The Google Book Search Settlement: Ends, Means, And The Future Of Books, James Grimmelmann

James Grimmelmann

For the past four years, Google has been systematically making digital copies of books in the collections of many major university libraries. It made the digital copies searchable through its web site--you couldn't read the books, but you could at least find out where the phrase you're looking for appears within them. This outraged copyright owners, who filed a class action lawsuit to make Google stop. Then, last fall, the parties to this large class action announced an even larger settlement: one that would give Google a license not only to scan books, but also to sell them.

The settlement …

How To Fix The Google Book Search Settlement, James Grimmelmann

James Grimmelmann

The proposed settlement in the Google Book Search case should be approved with strings attached. The project will be immensely good for society, and the proposed deal is a fair one for Google, for authors, and for publishers. The public interest demands, however, that the settlement be modified first. It creates two new entities—the Books Rights Registry Leviathan and the Google Book Search Behemoth—with dangerously concentrated power over the publishing industry. Left unchecked, they could trample on consumers in any number of ways. We the public have a right to demand that those entities be subject to healthy, pro-competitive oversight, …