Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Insurance Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Insurance Law

Evidence-Probative Value Of Inferences From Failure To Call A Witness, Cleaveland J. Rice S.Ed. Dec 1950

Evidence-Probative Value Of Inferences From Failure To Call A Witness, Cleaveland J. Rice S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

lnsured sued to recover sickness benefits under an insurance policy. The defense was that the insured was not in good health when the policy was issued. The only evidence introduced by the defendant insurance company was plaintiff's refusal to consent to taking the deposition of an examining hospital physician. Defendant's request for a directed verdict on the issue of good health was refused. After being instructed that from the refusal to permit taking of the deposition they might "presume that such evidence . . . would operate against plaintiff and be against his interest in this suit," the jury returned …


Federal Courts-Use Of A Cross-Claim Under Rule 13(G) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Rex Eames S.Ed. Nov 1950

Federal Courts-Use Of A Cross-Claim Under Rule 13(G) Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Rex Eames S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Under an ordinary automobile insurance policy, P insurance company promised to defend and indemnify Harvey for any suit arising from an accident involving his use of the insured truck. Collier sued Harvey in a state court alleging injuries due to the negligent use of the insured truck by two Harvey employees. Before judgment thereon, P, incorporated under the laws of Wisconsin, sued Harvey and Collier, citizens of Oklahoma, in the federal court. P sought a declaratory judgment on the grounds that (a) at the time of the accident the employees were under the control and supervision of the City …


Insurance-Reinstatement-''Insurability", Joseph G. Egan S.Ed. Jun 1950

Insurance-Reinstatement-''Insurability", Joseph G. Egan S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

lnsured took out a policy of life insurance with defendant company which contained a clause providing for reinstatement within five years after default on presentation "of evidence of insurability satisfactory to the company" and payment of overdue premiums with interest. After default in payment of premiums, insured requested reinstatement. The insured had taken up aviation in the interval between issuance of the policy and the request for reinstatement. The company agreed to reinstate on condition that the insured would agree to a modification of the policy, so that it would not cover death resulting from operation of any kind of …


Contracts-Measure Of Damages-Life Insurance Contract, Howard Van Antwerp Jun 1950

Contracts-Measure Of Damages-Life Insurance Contract, Howard Van Antwerp

Michigan Law Review

When the plaintiff was expelled from defendant Brotherhood an insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant was canceled and the cash surrender value paid to him in accordance with the terms of his policy. The directors of the Brotherhood later decided that this expulsion had been wrongful, whereupon the plaintiff returned the cash surrender value of the policy and demanded the return of all premiums paid. When this demand was refused, the plaintiff sued to recover damages for wrongful cancellation of his policy. The trial court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the premiums paid with …


Insurance-Subrogation-Right Of Insured To Recover On An Automobile "Collision" Policy After Full Settlement With The Negligent Wrongdoer, Robert W. Shadd S.Ed. Jun 1950

Insurance-Subrogation-Right Of Insured To Recover On An Automobile "Collision" Policy After Full Settlement With The Negligent Wrongdoer, Robert W. Shadd S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Respondent, whose automobile was covered by a policy of "collision" insurance in appellant insurance company, suffered serious personal injuries and complete loss of his car as a result of a collision with an oil company truck. Despite numerous telephone calls, appellant failed to settle for the cash value of the automobile, as required by the insurance contract. In the meantime, respondent brought an action against the oil company, joining the claims for personal injury and property damage, and executed a full release to that company in return for a settlement of $20,000. He then brought this action for actual damages …


Changing The Beneficiary Of A Life Insurance Contract, Grover C. Grismore Mar 1950

Changing The Beneficiary Of A Life Insurance Contract, Grover C. Grismore

Michigan Law Review

A cursory examination of the court reports will reveal that there is a constant stream of cases coming before our courts in which the principal questions at issue involve the disposition of the proceeds of matured life insurance policies. The question arises most often when the insured, having reserved the right to change the beneficiary, had manifested an intention that someone other than the beneficiary named in the policy should receive the proceeds, but had not complied with the formalities prescribed in his contract for effecting a change. Unfortunately, the answer to the question in the particular case has often …


Insurance-Insurable Interest-Joint Adventurers, Alan P. Goldstein S. Ed. Feb 1950

Insurance-Insurable Interest-Joint Adventurers, Alan P. Goldstein S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff and the deceased were operating an airplane commercially. Plaintiff had purchased the plane, and was paying the deceased $25 per week plus half of the profits of the venture. The deceased acted as pilot, and was instrumental in obtaining business. Plaintiff took out insurance on the plane, and also on the life of the deceased, although their only relationship was through the joint venture. The plane was wrecked and the deceased was killed while on company business. The claim for the plane was paid, but the defendant refused to pay on the life insurance policy, claiming that the plaintiff …


Appeal And Error-Union Of Law And Equity-Appealability Of Order Denying Demand For Jury Trial, Earl R. Boonstra S. Ed. Jan 1950

Appeal And Error-Union Of Law And Equity-Appealability Of Order Denying Demand For Jury Trial, Earl R. Boonstra S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Defendant held an insurance policy written by plaintiff which by its terms covered a hangar against loss by fire. After the hangar had been destroyed by fire, plaintiff instituted this suit for reformation on the ground that the contract had been written as a fire policy through mutual mistake. Defendant denied the mistake, filed a counterclaim to recover on the policy as written, and demanded a jury trial. Plaintiff moved to strike the demand, and the motion was granted. The court of appeals dismissed the defendant's appeal. On certiorari, held, affirmed. Not being a final decision, the order denying …