Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (1)
- Asbestos (1)
- Attorney Fees (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Borel (1)
-
- Building Envelopes (1)
- CCR (1)
- Condominium Law (1)
- Condominium Owners Associations (1)
- Construction (1)
- Construction Defect (1)
- Construction Industry (1)
- Contractors (1)
- Developer Insurance (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Insurance companies (1)
- Legislative Study Committee on Water Penetration of Condominiums (1)
- Oklahoma (1)
- Oklahoma Supreme Court (1)
- Ortiz (1)
- Prevailing Party (1)
- Property Developers (1)
- Rand (1)
- Reform (1)
- Subcontractors (1)
- Tort of bad faith (1)
- Washington Condominium Act (1)
- Water Infiltration (1)
- Water Intrusion (1)
- Why Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co. (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Insurance Law
Theories Of Asbestos Litigation Cost - Why Two Decades Of Procedural Reform Have Failed To Reduce Claimants' Expenses, Jeffrey M. Davidson
Theories Of Asbestos Litigation Cost - Why Two Decades Of Procedural Reform Have Failed To Reduce Claimants' Expenses, Jeffrey M. Davidson
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
"For It's One, Two, Three Strikes, You're Out . . .", 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (2006), Kaycee Hopwood
"For It's One, Two, Three Strikes, You're Out . . .", 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 493 (2006), Kaycee Hopwood
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Tarnished Golden Rule — Why Badillo V. Mid Century Insurance Co. Demands Further Clarification From The Oklahoma Supreme Court Regarding The Tort Of Bad Faith, Andrew Kernan
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Improving The Construction And Litigation Resolution Process: The 2005 Amendments To The Washington Condominium Act Are A Win-Win For Homeowners And Developers, Mark F. O'Donnell, David E. Chawes
Improving The Construction And Litigation Resolution Process: The 2005 Amendments To The Washington Condominium Act Are A Win-Win For Homeowners And Developers, Mark F. O'Donnell, David E. Chawes
Seattle University Law Review
On August 1, 2005, significant amendments to the Washington Condominium Act (WCA) became effective. These amendments were intended to substantially reduce water infiltration in multiunit residential buildings and to simplify the condominium construction dispute resolution process. The heart of the amendments is the implementation of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, as well as fee-shiftingprovisions which require the non-prevailing party to pay the attorney fees and costs of the prevailing party. A decade of lawsuits brought under the WCA by condominium owners associations against builders and developers, and in turn by builders against subcontractors, alleging defects in the ability of the …