Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Bad managers (1)
- Boston University Law Review (1)
- Clinical education (1)
- Commercial dealings (1)
- Community Justice Project (1)
-
- Corporate accounting scandals (1)
- Corporate governance (1)
- Cost of medical care (1)
- Employment and labor (1)
- Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy (1)
- Good managers (1)
- Governance structure (1)
- Government and politics (1)
- Health care reform (1)
- Health insurance (1)
- Health insurance premiums (1)
- Insurance clause (1)
- Law school clinics (1)
- Managerial quality (1)
- Poverty law (1)
- Public corporation (1)
- Review of Law and Economics (1)
- Risk aversion (1)
- Shareholder value (1)
- Student attorney representation (1)
- Tax incentives (1)
- Tobin's Q (1)
- Unemployment benefits (1)
- Unemployment insurance (1)
- Unemployment insurance claimants (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Insurance Law
The Core Corporate Governance Puzzle: Contextualizing The Link To Performance, Merritt B. Fox, Ronald J. Gilson, Darius Palia
The Core Corporate Governance Puzzle: Contextualizing The Link To Performance, Merritt B. Fox, Ronald J. Gilson, Darius Palia
Faculty Scholarship
There is a puzzle at the core of corporate governance theory. Prior scholarship reports a strong relationship between firms best at creating shareholder value and those rated highly by the established corporate governance indices. Little work explores why, however. We hypothesize that the link between governance and performance depends centrally on context. We illustrate the importance of context by exploring circumstances when a firm's governance structure can operate as a signal of the quality of its management. The idea is that better managers are on average more likely to choose a highly rated governance structure than are bad managers because …
Cultivating Justice For The Working Poor: Clinical Representation Of Unemployment Claimants, Colleen F. Shanahan
Cultivating Justice For The Working Poor: Clinical Representation Of Unemployment Claimants, Colleen F. Shanahan
Faculty Scholarship
The combination of current economic conditions and recent changes in the United States' welfare system makes representation of unemployment insurance claimants by clinic students a timely learning opportunity. While unemployment insurance claimants often share similarities with student attorneys, they are unable to access justice as easily as student attorneys, and as a result, face the risk of severe poverty. Clinical representation of unemployment claimants is a rich opportunity for students to experience making a difference for a client, and to understand the issues of poverty and justice that these clients experience along the way. These cases reveal that larger lessons …
Who Pays? Who Benefits? Unfairness In American Health Care, Clark C. Havighurst, Barak D. Richman
Who Pays? Who Benefits? Unfairness In American Health Care, Clark C. Havighurst, Barak D. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
American-style health insurance greatly amplifies price-gouging opportunities for health care providers, who inflate prices both to enrich themselves and to subsidize and expand the nation’s health care enterprise. To the extent that lower- and middle-income Americans with private health coverage pay premiums that go to support and expand the system, they are subject to an unfair (regressive) “head tax” levied by unaccountable entities for ostensibly public but also private purposes. Lower-income premium payers also often pay for costly health coverage designed to suit the economic interests and values of professional and other elites rather than their own. They also appear …
The Devil Made Me Do It: The Corporate Purchase Of Insurance, Victor P. Goldberg
The Devil Made Me Do It: The Corporate Purchase Of Insurance, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
Despite the fact that public corporations ought to be risk neutral, they often carry insurance. This note first considers why insurance (or more precisely, the package of services provided by insurance companies) might create value, regardless of the risk preferences of managers, shareholders, or other corporate stakeholders. One motive is that their contractual counterparties – buyers, lessors, and lenders – require that they carry insurance. Three explanations for why the requirement might be value enhancing are proposed.