Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Asylum Refugee Act (1)
- Border policing (1)
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. (1)
- Child welfare (1)
- Citizenship (1)
-
- Cooperative federalism (1)
- Cuba (1)
- Denaturalization (1)
- Education and migrant youth (1)
- Emigration (1)
- Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) (1)
- Family reunification (1)
- Government policy (1)
- Haiti (1)
- Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 1998 (1)
- Human immunodeficiency virus (1)
- Humanitarian (1)
- Illinois (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (1)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service (1)
- Iowa (1)
- Legislative intent (1)
- Legislative powers (1)
- Migrant youth detention (1)
- Nicaragua (1)
- Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (1)
- North Carolina (1)
- Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) (1)
- Preemption (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Immigration Law
Heeding The Voices Of Migrant Youth: The Need For Action, Randi Mandelbaum
Heeding The Voices Of Migrant Youth: The Need For Action, Randi Mandelbaum
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Unaccompanied: The Plight of Immigrant Youth at the Border. By Emily Ruehs-Navarro.
The Significance Of The Local In Immigration Regulation, Cristina M. Rodríguez
The Significance Of The Local In Immigration Regulation, Cristina M. Rodríguez
Michigan Law Review
The proliferation of state and local regulation designed to control immigrant movement generated considerable media attention and high-profile lawsuits in 2006 and 2007. Proponents and opponents of these measures share one basic assumption, with deep roots in constitutional doctrine and political rhetoric: immigration control is the exclusive responsibility of the federal government. Because of the persistence of this assumption, assessments of this important trend have failed to explain why state and local measures are arising in large numbers, and why the regulatory uniformity both sides claim to seek is neither achievable nor desirable. I argue that the time has come …
The Exclusion Of Hiv-Positive Immigrants Under The Nicaraguan Adjustment And Central American Relief Act And The Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act, Statutory Interpretation, Communicable Disease, Public Health, Legislative Intent, Shayna S. Cook
Michigan Law Review
The United States has turned away immigrants infected with the human immunodeficiency virus ("HIV") under the public health exclusion of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") since the mid-1980's. Since Congress codified the HIV exclusion in 1993, any alien applying for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident, or refugee status must first have a blood test for HIV. The HIV exclusion is not absolute, however. Each HIV-positive alien can apply for one of two waivers of the HIV exclusion that are available in the INA. When an alien applies for immigrant or permanent resident …
The Schneiderman Case: An Inside View Of The Roosevelt Court, Jeffrey F. Liss
The Schneiderman Case: An Inside View Of The Roosevelt Court, Jeffrey F. Liss
Michigan Law Review
Only rarely in the study of Supreme Court history do events, personalities, records, and historical sources converge to afford an intimate view of that institution. Schneiderman v. United States, in its own right an important decision in the field of denaturalization law, provides such an opportunity. The manuscript collections of the major adversaries on the Court are well-preserved, and a surviving major figure from among the parties to ·the litigation has provided personal insight into the intricacies of the case.