Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Aliens (1)
- Authority (1)
- Circuit (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Court (1)
-
- Denaturalization (1)
- Detain (1)
- Detention (1)
- District (1)
- Due process (1)
- Emigration and Immigration (1)
- Exclusion (1)
- Executive (1)
- Government (1)
- Harborage (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Judicial (1)
- Judicial authority (1)
- Martinez (1)
- Mezei (1)
- Parole (1)
- Petitioner (1)
- Release (1)
- Rights (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- Terrorists (1)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 5th Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Immigration Law
Snap: How The Moral Elasticity Of The Denaturalization Statute Goes Too Far, Aram A. Gavoor, Daniel Miktus
Snap: How The Moral Elasticity Of The Denaturalization Statute Goes Too Far, Aram A. Gavoor, Daniel Miktus
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Comprehensive immigration reform is a popular topic in Congress. While many reform bills have been offered, none have addressed the significant substantive and procedural issues surrounding denaturalization, the process where the federal government may seek to have a naturalized persons citizenship revoked in federal court if his citizenship was unlawfully or fraudulently procured.Though denaturalization serves public policy as a final check on naturalization fraud, existing law also permits the government to denaturalize an individual solely for speech and expressive association that occurs after one acquires citizenship. This provision, 8 U.S.C. § 1451(c), violates naturalized citizens First Amendment rights to free …
The Efficacy Of Indefinite Detention: Assessment Of Immigration Case Law In Kiyemba V. Obama, Hansdeep Singh
The Efficacy Of Indefinite Detention: Assessment Of Immigration Case Law In Kiyemba V. Obama, Hansdeep Singh
University of Massachusetts Law Review
This note discusses the potential indefinite detention, also called preventative detention, of the Uighur detainees. Until early 2010, the U.S. Government had been unable to resettle seventeen Uighurs for over 5 years. In 2009, the Supreme Court, granted certiorari on the issue of whether federal courts have the authority to ―order the release of prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay 'where the Executive detention is indefinite and without authorization in law, and release into the continental United States is the only possible effective remedy.‘ However, on March 1, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the case to the United States …