Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (8)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Courts (4)
- Immigration Law (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
-
- Law and Society (4)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Juvenile Law (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Legal Remedies (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Military, War, and Peace (2)
- President/Executive Department (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Family Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Organizations Law (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Human rights (5)
- Immigration (4)
- Abortion (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Crime (3)
-
- Aliens (2)
- Asylum (2)
- Custody (2)
- Equality (2)
- Fetus (2)
- Gender (2)
- Human Rights (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Law Enforcement (2)
- Persecution (2)
- Refugee (2)
- Rights (2)
- Sovereignty (2)
- United States (2)
- Violence (2)
- Women (2)
- Abduction (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Agent (1)
- Alien Tort Statute (1)
- Alive (1)
- Alvarez-Machain (1)
- American (1)
- Arrest (1)
- Asylum law (1)
Articles 1 - 14 of 14
Full-Text Articles in Human Rights Law
Methods Of Compensating Victims Of War: Combating The Problems Of An Enduring System, Bryan S. Hance
Methods Of Compensating Victims Of War: Combating The Problems Of An Enduring System, Bryan S. Hance
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Child's Right To Be Heard And Represented In Judicial Proceedings , Howard A. Davidson
The Child's Right To Be Heard And Represented In Judicial Proceedings , Howard A. Davidson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Alvarez-Machain: Kidnapping In The "War On Drugs" - A Matter Of Executive Discretion Or Lawlessness?, Michael G. Mckinnon
United States V. Alvarez-Machain: Kidnapping In The "War On Drugs" - A Matter Of Executive Discretion Or Lawlessness?, Michael G. Mckinnon
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Litigating The Holocaust: A Consistent Theory In Tort For The Private Enforcement Of Human Rights Violations , Derek Brown
Litigating The Holocaust: A Consistent Theory In Tort For The Private Enforcement Of Human Rights Violations , Derek Brown
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Human “Wrongs”?: The U.S. Takes An Unpopular Stance In Opposing A Strong International Criminal Court, Gaining Unlikely Allies In The Process, Tomas A. Kuehn
Human “Wrongs”?: The U.S. Takes An Unpopular Stance In Opposing A Strong International Criminal Court, Gaining Unlikely Allies In The Process, Tomas A. Kuehn
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Succession By Estoppel: Hong Kong's Succession To The Iccpr, Peter K. Yu
Succession By Estoppel: Hong Kong's Succession To The Iccpr, Peter K. Yu
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Created Equal: How The Declaration Of Independence Recognizes And Guarantees The Right To Life For The Unborn, Mark Trapp
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seeking Asylum For Former Child Soldiers And Victims Of Human Trafficking, Tina Javaherian
Seeking Asylum For Former Child Soldiers And Victims Of Human Trafficking, Tina Javaherian
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An End To The Violence: Justifying Gender As A "Particular Social Group", Suzanne Sidun
An End To The Violence: Justifying Gender As A "Particular Social Group", Suzanne Sidun
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Fate Of "Unremovable" Aliens Before And After September 11, 2001: The Supreme Court's Presumptive Six-Month Limit To Post-Removal-Period Detention, Megan Peitzke
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A New Paradigm For The Alien Tort Statute Under Extraterritoriality And The Universality Principle, Jason Jarvis
A New Paradigm For The Alien Tort Statute Under Extraterritoriality And The Universality Principle, Jason Jarvis
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
We Don't Need To See Them Cry: Eliminating The Subjective Apprehension Element Of The Well-Founded Fear Analysis For Child Refugee Applicants, Bridgette A. Carr
We Don't Need To See Them Cry: Eliminating The Subjective Apprehension Element Of The Well-Founded Fear Analysis For Child Refugee Applicants, Bridgette A. Carr
Pepperdine Law Review
This article addresses a barrier to effective protection faced by child refugee applicants. Currently all refugee applicants, including infants, are required to satisfy two elements of well-founded fear. All applicants must prove that they face an objective risk of persecution and that they subjectively fear this risk. But children often cannot exhibit the subject apprehension element of the test. As a result, UNHCR, and the U.S and Canadian governments issued guidelines that encourage decision makers to accept other evidence to prove a child's subjective apprehension when the child is unable to exhibit fear. However, this approach does not go far …
Constitutional Democracy, Human Dignity, And Entrenched Evil, Mark A. Graber
Constitutional Democracy, Human Dignity, And Entrenched Evil, Mark A. Graber
Pepperdine Law Review
The following essay pays tribute to Sandy Levinson's thoughts on constitutional compromises by paying tribute to the thoughts on constitutional compromises by our common mentor, Walter Murphy. Rather than directly engage in a dialogue with Compromise and Constitutionalism, the analysis below joins the preexisting dialogue between Professors Levinson and Murphy on how to construct a decent polity among people who have deep disputes over what constitutes political decency. Walter Murphy is unfortunately largely known to legal audiences only through the work of such outstanding mentees as Sandy Levinson, Jim Fleming, Christopher Eisgruber, Andrew Koppelman, Jennifer Nedelsky, and Robert George. Walter …