Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Climate litigation (2)
- American Exceptionalism (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Climate adaptation (1)
- Climate change (1)
-
- Climate disclosure (1)
- Climate justice (1)
- Climate mitigation (1)
- Climate rights (1)
- Cold war (1)
- Corporate liability (1)
- Environmental rights (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- Foreign affairs (1)
- Global South (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Inter-American System of Human Rights (1)
- International environmental law (1)
- International human rights (1)
- Legal isolationism (1)
- New political thinking (1)
- Paris Agreement (1)
- Soviet Union (1)
- Transnationalism (1)
- Verfassung und Recht in Ubersee (1)
- World Comparative Law (1)
- Yale Law Journal (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Human Rights Law
Global Climate Litigation Report: 2023 Status Review, Michael Burger, Maria Antonia Tigre
Global Climate Litigation Report: 2023 Status Review, Michael Burger, Maria Antonia Tigre
Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
This Global Climate Litigation Report: 2023 Status Review, which updates previous United Nations Environment Programme reports published in 2017 and 2020, provides an overview of the current state of climate change litigation and an update of global climate change litigation trends. It provides judges, lawyers, advocates, policymakers, researchers, environmental defenders, climate activists, human rights activists (including women’s rights activists), NGOs, businesses and the international community with an essential resource to understand the current state of global climate litigation, including descriptions of the key issues that courts have faced in the course of climate change cases.
Transnational Insights For Climate Litigation At The European Court Of Human Rights: A South-North Perspective In Pursuit Of Climate Justice, Melanie Murcott, Maria Antonia Tigre, Nesa Zimmermann
Transnational Insights For Climate Litigation At The European Court Of Human Rights: A South-North Perspective In Pursuit Of Climate Justice, Melanie Murcott, Maria Antonia Tigre, Nesa Zimmermann
Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
The global climate crisis is increasingly recognised as an issue of climate injustice, including because it is causing (and worsening) inequalities and human rights violations. Moreover, responsibility for emissions and vulnerability to climate impacts are not evenly distributed. They vary among and within states. In order to tackle these issues of justice both within and among states, litigants have taken to domestic and regional courts to engage in climate litigation. A body of transnational climate jurisprudence is emerging in which courts are increasingly looking to laws beyond their relevant state or region, engaging with the moral aims of human rights …
Foreign Authority, American Exceptionalism, And The Dred Scott Case, Sarah H. Cleveland
Foreign Authority, American Exceptionalism, And The Dred Scott Case, Sarah H. Cleveland
Faculty Scholarship
At least since Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in 1831, the idea that America is distinctive from other nations has permeated much political and social commentary. The United States has been variously perceived as unique in its history, its culture, its national values, its social movements, and its social and political institutions. While the term technically refers only to distinctiveness or difference, "exceptionalism" may have positive or negative aspects – what Harold Koh has called "America's Jekyll-and-Hyde exceptionalism." In the legal realm, claims of exceptionalism have been offered to support what Michael Ingnatieff identifies as "legal isolationism" – or refusal by …
International Human Rights Law In Soviet And American Courts, Lori Fisler Damrosch
International Human Rights Law In Soviet And American Courts, Lori Fisler Damrosch
Faculty Scholarship
To what extent should domestic courts apply international law – specifically the international law of human rights? I would like to examine this question with reference to two very different states: the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States. For quite distinct reasons, neither of the two has yet fully embraced the idea of direct application in national tribunals of the body of international law that regulates the relationship between human beings and their own governments. As the post-Cold War era unfolds, it is time to ask whether either or both of these erstwhile adversaries might finally be …