Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (4)
- HIPAA (3)
- Health (3)
- Index (3)
- Medical Malpractice Act (3)
-
- Act (2)
- Boyd v. Bulala (2)
- Electronic (2)
- HIV (2)
- Insurance (2)
- 1996 (1)
- AIDS (1)
- ARRA (1)
- ATLA (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (1)
- Advanced Health-Care Services Inc. v. Radford Community Hospital (1)
- Amarasinge v. Sentara Hospitals (1)
- American Bank and Trust Co. v. Community Hospitalat Los Gatos-Saratoga (1)
- Archer & Johnson v. Mayes (1)
- Association of Trial Lawyers of America (1)
- Bioterrorism (1)
- Borgia v. City of New York (1)
- Brown v. Koulizakis (1)
- Brumback v. Horng (1)
- Bulala v. Boyd (1)
- CDC (1)
- CRISPR (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Caudill v. Wise Rambler (1)
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Health Law and Policy
Regulating Human Germline Modification In Light Of Crispr, Sarah Ashley Barnett
Regulating Human Germline Modification In Light Of Crispr, Sarah Ashley Barnett
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Silence Is Golden...Except In Health Care Philanthropy, Stacey A. Tovino
Silence Is Golden...Except In Health Care Philanthropy, Stacey A. Tovino
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Health Care Law, Kathleen M. Mccauley, Kristi L. Vanderlaan
Health Care Law, Kathleen M. Mccauley, Kristi L. Vanderlaan
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Health Care Law, Sean P. Byrne, Paul Walkinshaw
Health Care Law, Sean P. Byrne, Paul Walkinshaw
University of Richmond Law Review
Arguably, no other field of law in Virginia matches the complexity, magnitude, and universality of health care. It therefore comes as little surprise that Virginia's legislative and judicial branches of government devoted substantial attention to health care law issues in 2006 and 2007. Between April 2006 and April 2007 the time period covered by this article the Supreme Court of Virginia decided a large number of cases directly affecting health care law in the Commonwealth. The 2007 legislative session also addressed a host of health care issues and those with the most impact are summarized herein. These judicial and legislative …
Health Care Law, Peter M. Mellette, Emily W. G. Towey, J. Vaden Hunt
Health Care Law, Peter M. Mellette, Emily W. G. Towey, J. Vaden Hunt
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Recent Developments In Medical Malpractice And Health Care Law, Peter M. Mellette
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Recent Developments In Medical Malpractice And Health Care Law, Peter M. Mellette
University of Richmond Law Review
Over the past year, medical malpractice and health care law in the Commonwealth have undergone significant changes. Major case decisions and significant legislative activity, both at the state and federal levels, have altered the playing field for many health care providers, insurers, and consumers.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Medical Malpractice The Year In Review, Phillip C. Stone, Charles F. Hilton
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Medical Malpractice The Year In Review, Phillip C. Stone, Charles F. Hilton
University of Richmond Law Review
In its 1989 session, the General Assembly amended several medical malpractice statutes. Perhaps the most important changes expanded the definition of "health care provider" under the Medical Malpractice Act (the "Act"), and clarified the qualification requirements for expert witnesses.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Medical Negligence, Gwen M. Schockemoehl
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Medical Negligence, Gwen M. Schockemoehl
University of Richmond Law Review
This article examines amendments to the statutes that affect medical negligence actions made by the General Assembly in 1987 and 1988. In addition, this article reviews judicial decisions from 1986, 1987 and early 1988 that will have impact on medical negligence actions in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
A Hospital's Dilemma: The Legal Implications Of Promulgating Guidelines Concerning Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Leonard C. Heath Jr.
A Hospital's Dilemma: The Legal Implications Of Promulgating Guidelines Concerning Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Leonard C. Heath Jr.
University of Richmond Law Review
Fear has struck the workplace. The source of this fear is not lack of job security, inflation, recession or a concern about the United States' trade imbalance. The source of the fear is a disease--Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS)-and the virus that causes AIDS, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
The Limitation On Recovery In Medical Negligence Cases, Edward W. Taylor, William G. Shields
The Limitation On Recovery In Medical Negligence Cases, Edward W. Taylor, William G. Shields
University of Richmond Law Review
Chapter 611, 1976 Acts of Assembly, provided for sweeping changes in the laws of medical and hospital negligence in Virginia. The Act affects all medical negligence actions arising after July 1, 1976. The legislation was enacted during a time when many perceived a medical malpractice crisis in Virginia. This article will review the historical background which led to this perception and will analyze whether, in fact, this crisis did exist. Finally, the article will demonstrate that the Act is both unnecessary and more importantly, unconstitutional.
Virginia's Continuing Negligent Treatment Rule: Farely V. Goode And Fenton V. Danaceau, J. R. Zepkin
Virginia's Continuing Negligent Treatment Rule: Farely V. Goode And Fenton V. Danaceau, J. R. Zepkin
University of Richmond Law Review
Since 1902 the continuing negligent treatment rule has been applied to medical malpractice claims to establish when the statute of limitations begins to run on a particular cause of action. The rule is typically used in cases where the parties have engaged in a course of dealing over a period of time and the wrong complained of has stretched over all or part of this period.
Book Reviews, Edward S. Graves, David L. Ross
Book Reviews, Edward S. Graves, David L. Ross
University of Richmond Law Review
These are book reviews from 1979.