Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Mapp v. Ohio (2)
- Search and seizure (2)
- Arrest (1)
- Arrest without a warrant (1)
- Chief Justice Warren (1)
-
- Discourse of adjudication (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Incorporation doctrine (1)
- Judicial warrant (1)
- Law of arrest (1)
- Obscenity (1)
- Ohio Supreme Court (1)
- Probable cause (1)
- Search warrants (1)
- Secret agent cases (1)
- United States v. Matlock (1)
- United States v. Robinson (1)
- Warren Court (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Fourth Amendment
Mapp V. Ohio: The First Shot Fired In The Warren Court's Criminal Procedure 'Revolution', Yale Kamisar
Mapp V. Ohio: The First Shot Fired In The Warren Court's Criminal Procedure 'Revolution', Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
Although Earl Warren ascended to the Supreme Court in 1953, when we speak of the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure we really mean the movement that got underway half-way through the Chief Justice's sixteen-year reign. It was the 1961 case of Mapp v. Ohio, overruling Wolf v. Colorado and holding that the state courts had to exclude illegally seized evidence as a matter of federal constitutional law, that is generally regarded as having launched the so-called criminal procedure revolution.
Arrest, James Boyd White
Arrest, James Boyd White
Book Chapters
The constitutional law of arrest governs every occasion on which a government officer interferes with an individual’s freedom, from full-scale custodial arrests at one end of the spectrum to momentary detentions at the other. Its essential principle is that a court, not a police officer or other executive official, shall ultimately decide whether a particular interference with the liberty of an individual is justified. The court may make this judgment either before an arrest, when the police seek a judicial warrant authorizing it, or shortly after an arrest without a warrant, in a hearing held expressly for that purpose. The …
The Fourth Amendment As A Way Of Talking About People: A Study Of Robinson And Matlock, James Boyd White
The Fourth Amendment As A Way Of Talking About People: A Study Of Robinson And Matlock, James Boyd White
Articles
One way to regard what the Supreme Court has done in the cases it has decided under the Fourth Amendment is to say that it has created a specialized discourse of adjudication, a language in which it can talk about and dispose of the repeated conflicts that arise between an officer engaged in the process of crime control and a citizen upon whose freedom or security he intrudes. The events which bring these two figures together are bewildering in their variety and complexity, and the claims on each side are deeply felt and strenuously made. It has not been easy …