Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Chemerinsky (2)
- Due process (2)
- Erwin Chemerinsky (2)
- 1983 litigation (1)
- 2004 Supreme Court term (1)
-
- American History (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Bishop (1)
- Bishop v. Wood (1)
- Board of Regents v. Roth (1)
- Cannon v. City of West Palm Beach (1)
- Chief justice (1)
- Composition of the court (1)
- Congress enforcement power (1)
- Conservative court (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Constitutional rulings (1)
- Deprivation of liberty interest (1)
- Deprivation of life liberty or property (1)
- Deprivation of property Ciambriello v. County of Nassau (1)
- Equal rights (1)
- Equality (1)
- Federal power (1)
- Federal statute (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Gonzales v. Raich (1)
- Ineffective assistance of counsel (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judicial deference (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
Look Back At The Rehnquist Era And An Overview Of The 2004 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Look Back At The Rehnquist Era And An Overview Of The 2004 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
A Post-Race Equal Protection?, Trina Jones, Mario L. Barnes, Erwin Chemerinsky
A Post-Race Equal Protection?, Trina Jones, Mario L. Barnes, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
Most vividly demonstrated in the 2008 election of the first African-American President of the United States, post-race is a term that has been widely used to characterize a belief in the declining significance of race in the United States. Post-racialists, then, believe that racial discrimination is rare and aberrant behavior as evidenced by America’s pronounced racial progress. One practical consequence of a commitment to post-racialism is the belief that governments - both state and federal - should not consider race in their decision making. One might imagine that the recent explosion in post-racial discourse also portends a revised understanding of …
Washington V. Glucksberg Was Tragically Wrong, Erwin Chemerinsky
Washington V. Glucksberg Was Tragically Wrong, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
Properly focused, there were two questions before the Supreme Court in Washington v. Glucksberg. First, in light of all of the other non-textual rights protected by the Supreme Court under the "liberty" of the Due Process Clause, is the right to assisted death a fundamental right? Second, if so, is the prohibition of assisted death necessary to achieve a compelling interest? Presented in this way, it is clear that the Court erred in Washington v. Glucksberg. The right of a terminally ill person to end his or her life is an essential aspect of autonomy, comparable to aspects of autonomy …