Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- American Politics (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
-
- Contracts (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Economics (1)
- Finance (1)
- International Relations (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Administration (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Economics (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Keyword
-
- 14th Amendment (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Bolling v. Sharpe (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Citizenship Clause (1)
-
- Consent of U.S. to be sued for debt (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Debtor-creditor law (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Fiscal deficit (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Government debt (1)
- Original Intent (1)
- Original Public Meaning (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Public debt (1)
- Reorganization (1)
- Restructure (1)
- Reverse Incorporation (1)
- Selective default (1)
- Sovereign debt (1)
- U.S. Treasury notes and bills (1)
- United States (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Originalism And The Other Desegregation Decision, Ryan C. Williams
Originalism And The Other Desegregation Decision, Ryan C. Williams
All Faculty Scholarship
Critics of originalist approaches to constitutional interpretation often focus on the “intolerable” results that originalism would purportedly require. Although originalists have disputed many such claims, one contention that they have been famously unable to answer satisfactorily is the claim that their theory is incapable of justifying the Supreme Court’s famous 1954 decision in Bolling v. Sharpe. Decided the same day as Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling is the case that is most closely associated with the Supreme Court’s so-called “reverse incorporation” doctrine, which interprets the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment as if it effectively "incorporates" the Fourteenth …
United States Sovereign Debt: A Thought Experiment On Default And Restructuring, Charles W. Mooney Jr.
United States Sovereign Debt: A Thought Experiment On Default And Restructuring, Charles W. Mooney Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
This chapter adopts the working assumption that it is conceivable that at some time in the future it would be in the interest of the United States to restructure its sovereign debt (i.e., to reduce the principal amount). It addresses in particular U.S. Treasury Securities. The chapter first provides an overview of the intermediated, tiered holding system for book-entry Treasuries. For the first time the chapter then explores whether and how—logistically and legally—such a restructuring could be effected. It posits the sort of dire scenario that might make such a restructuring advantageous. It then outlines a novel scheme …