Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal jurisdiction (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Abstention (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
-
- Civil rights (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- Condemnation (1)
- Congress (1)
- Consent (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Crime (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Due process clause (1)
- Eleventh Amendment (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Equality (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Ex Post Facto (1)
- Exclusionary Rule (1)
- Federal (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Fetus (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Founders (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Gender (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Application Of The Abstention Doctrine To Inverse Condemnation Actions In Federal Court , John T. Harris
Application Of The Abstention Doctrine To Inverse Condemnation Actions In Federal Court , John T. Harris
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Continues Its Journey Down The Ever Narrowing Paths Of Section 1983 And The Due Process Clause: An Analysis Of Parratt V. Taylor, Robert E. Palmer
The Supreme Court Continues Its Journey Down The Ever Narrowing Paths Of Section 1983 And The Due Process Clause: An Analysis Of Parratt V. Taylor, Robert E. Palmer
Pepperdine Law Review
After nearly a century of quiet slumber, the Supreme Court awoke the sleeping giant. In the past two decades, 42 U.S.C. §1983 has evolved into a judicial Frankenstein monster. Unable to control the beast, the Court has attempted to restrict the creature's movements by unnecessarily limiting its constitutional source. If followed to its logical conclusion, the Court's narrow reading of the Constitution may ultimately demote all due process violations to state tort remedies. This note traces the legislative and judicial evolution of section 1983 as well as the statute's present interaction with the due process clause. The vehicle for this …
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.