Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
-
- Education Law (1)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Other Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Women's Studies (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Rights Of Belonging For Women, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Rights Of Belonging For Women, Rebecca E. Zietlow
Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality
No abstract provided.
Is The Antidiscrimination Project Being Ended?, Michael J. Zimmer
Is The Antidiscrimination Project Being Ended?, Michael J. Zimmer
Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality
No abstract provided.
E Pluribus Unum: Liberalism's March To Be The Singular Influence On Civil Rights At The Supreme Court, Aaron J. Shuler
E Pluribus Unum: Liberalism's March To Be The Singular Influence On Civil Rights At The Supreme Court, Aaron J. Shuler
Aaron J Shuler
Rogers Smith writes that American political culture can best be understood as a blend of liberal, republican and illiberal ascriptive ideologies. The U.S. Supreme Court’s constitutional jurisprudence has largely reflected this thesis. While the Court moved away from permitting laws that explicitly construct hierarchies in the 20th century and made tepid references to egalitarian principles during the Warren Court, liberalism has prevailed in the majority of the Court’s decisions. Gains in civil rights through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection and Substantive Due Process clauses were achieved primarily through liberal notions of de-regulation, a market economy and individual freedom. Conversely, State …
Antidiscrimination Law And The Multiracial Experience: A Reply To Nancy Leong, Tina F. Botts
Antidiscrimination Law And The Multiracial Experience: A Reply To Nancy Leong, Tina F. Botts
Tina F Botts
Misunderstanding the concept of race as based in biology is the root error of Professor Nancy Leong's recommendation of a switch to "perceived race" in antidiscrimination law in order to protect multiracial persons from illegal racial discrimination. Once race is understood as socio-historically constructed and context-dependent rather than as rooted in biology, antidiscrimination law need only add multiracial persons to the categories of specially protected groups in order to protect multiracial persons from illegal discrimination.