Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Adoption (1)
- Birth fathers (1)
- Black Males Incarceration (1)
- Black males (1)
-
- Constitutional Law; Equal Protection; State Law; Federal Law; Fourteenth Amendment; Gender Issues; State Law (1)
- Dignity (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Fatherhood (1)
- Jail (1)
- Jim Crow (1)
- Justice Kennedy (1)
- Law (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Obergefell v. Hodges (1)
- Parenthood (1)
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1)
- Respectability (1)
- Same-sex marriage (1)
- US v. Windsor (1)
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Grasping Fatherhood In Abortion And Adoption.Pdf, Malinda L. Seymore
Grasping Fatherhood In Abortion And Adoption.Pdf, Malinda L. Seymore
Malinda L. Seymore
The Respectable Dignity Of Obergefell V. Hodges, Yuvraj Joshi
The Respectable Dignity Of Obergefell V. Hodges, Yuvraj Joshi
Yuvraj Joshi
In declaring state laws that restrict same-sex marriage unconstitutional, Justice Kennedy invoked “dignity” nine times—to no one’s surprise. References in Obergefell to “dignity” are in important respects the culmination of Justice Kennedy’s elevation of the concept, dating back to the Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In Casey, “dignity” expressed respect for a woman’s freedom to make choices about her pregnancy. Casey laid the foundation for Lawrence v. Texas, which similarly respected the freedom of choice of homosexual persons. Yet, starting in United States v. Windsor and continuing in Obergefell, the narrative began to change. Dignity veered …
The New Battleground For Same-Sex Couples Is Equal Rights For Their Kids, Tanya Washington
The New Battleground For Same-Sex Couples Is Equal Rights For Their Kids, Tanya Washington
Tanya Monique Washington
No abstract provided.
Better Safe? Why Obergefell Matters Before Court Rules, Tanya Washington
Better Safe? Why Obergefell Matters Before Court Rules, Tanya Washington
Tanya Monique Washington
No abstract provided.
Casenote, Constitutional Law--Equal Protection--New York Statute Requiring Consent Of Mother, But Not Of Father, As Prerequisite To Adoption Of Illegitimate Child Violates The Fourteenth Amendment Because It Draws Gender-Based Distinction Which Bears No Substantial Relation To State Interest In Encouraging Adoption Of Illegitimate Children--Caban V. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380 (1979), Mary F. Radford
Mary F. Radford
No abstract provided.
Punitive Injunctions, Nirej S. Sekhon
The Newest Jim Crow And The Incarceration Of Black Males, Edward Earl Bell
The Newest Jim Crow And The Incarceration Of Black Males, Edward Earl Bell
Dr. Edward E. Bell
Black males are in jail. Are "we" to blame? The New Jim Crow is alive.