Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 133 S. Ct. 2652 (1)
- 133 S. Ct. 2675 (1)
- 135 S. Ct. 2584 (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Consortium to Wife (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- DOMA (1)
- Defense of Marriage Act (1)
- Denial of Loss (1)
- Due process of law (1)
- Emphasis on Equality (1)
- Equal Pay Act of 1963 (1)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (1)
- Justification (Law) (1)
- Marriage (1)
- Married Women's Act (1)
- Miskunas v. Union Carbide Corporation (1)
- Obergefell v. Hodges (1)
- Race discrimination (1)
- Same-Sex Marriage (1)
- Same-sex marriage (1)
- United States v. Hollingsworth (1)
- United States v. Windsor (1)
- Violation of Fourteenth Amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Dissenting From History: The False Narratives Of The Obergefell Dissents, Christopher R. Leslie
Dissenting From History: The False Narratives Of The Obergefell Dissents, Christopher R. Leslie
Indiana Law Journal
According to a quote attributed to numerous philosophers and political leaders, “History is written by victors.”1 In the legal battle over same-sex marriage, those opposed to marriage equality have attempted to disprove this age-old adage. In response to the majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges—which held that state laws banning same-sex marriage violate the Fourteenth Amendment—each of the four dissenting Justices issued his own dissenting opinion. Every one of these dissents misrepresented the circumstances and precedent leading up to the Obergefell decision. Collectively, the Obergefell dissenters have valiantly tried to rewrite America’s legal, constitutional, and social history, all in an …
Evolving Values, Animus, And Same-Sex Marriage, Daniel O. Conkle
Evolving Values, Animus, And Same-Sex Marriage, Daniel O. Conkle
Indiana Law Journal
In this Essay, I contend that a Fourteenth Amendment right to same-sex marriage will emerge, and properly so, when the Supreme Court determines that justice so requires and when, in the words of Professor Alexander Bickel, the Court’s recognition of this right will “in a rather immediate foreseeable future . . . gain general assent.” I suggest that we are fast approaching that juncture, and I go on to analyze three possible justifications for such a ruling: first, substantive due process; second, heightened scrutiny equal protection; and third, rational basis equal protection coupled with a finding of illicit “animus.” I …
Denial Of Loss Of Consortium To Wife As Violation Of Fourteenth Amendment Right Of Equal Protection, Ann L. Mccallister
Denial Of Loss Of Consortium To Wife As Violation Of Fourteenth Amendment Right Of Equal Protection, Ann L. Mccallister
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.