Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Amar (Akhil Reed) (2)
- Attainder Clause (2)
- Colorado (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Gay (2)
-
- Homosexuality (2)
- Inequality (2)
- Kennedy (Anthony) (2)
- Queer (2)
- Romer v. Evans (2)
- Scalia (Antonin) (2)
- Strict scrutiny (2)
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Finality requirement (1)
- Judicial economy (1)
- MacDonald Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County (1)
- Plessy v. Ferguson (1)
- Prudential concern (1)
- Ripeness doctrine (1)
- Robinson v. California (1)
- Takings claim (1)
- United States v. Brown (1)
- Variance (1)
- Williamson Country Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Determining Ripeness Of Substantive Due Process Claims Brought By Landowners Against Local Governments, David S. Mendel
Determining Ripeness Of Substantive Due Process Claims Brought By Landowners Against Local Governments, David S. Mendel
Michigan Law Review
Landowners who sustain economic harm from arbitrary and capricious applications of land use regulations may sue the local government entities responsible for applying those regulations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the local government entities deprived them of substantive due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. A landowner who brings this claim - an "as-applied arbitrary and capricious substantive due process" claim - may in appropriate cases seek declaratory and injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees. Despite controversy among courts and commentators over both the definition of property interests protected by the Due Process Clause and the standard …
Attainder And Amendment 2: Romer's Rightness, Akhil Reed Amar
Attainder And Amendment 2: Romer's Rightness, Akhil Reed Amar
Michigan Law Review
Call me silly. In fact, call me terminally silly. For despite Justice Scalia's remarkably confident claim, I believe, and shall try to prove below, that the Romer Court majority opinion invalidating Colorado's Amendment 2 was right both in form and in substance, both logically and sociologically. I stress "form" and "logic" at the outset because I share Justice Scalia's belief in the importance of these things in constitutional adjudication. I also share his commitment to constitutional text, history, and structure, and his suspicion of "free-form" constitutionalism. And so I shall highlight the text, history, and spirit of a constitutional clause …
Is Amendment 2 Really A Bill Of Attainder? Some Questions About Professor Amar's Analysis Of Romer, Roderick M. Hills Jr.
Is Amendment 2 Really A Bill Of Attainder? Some Questions About Professor Amar's Analysis Of Romer, Roderick M. Hills Jr.
Michigan Law Review
As I first discovered as a law student in Professor Amar's classes on legal history and federal courts, it is generally an intellectual treat to listen to Professor Amar's legal analysis, even when he is attacking one's own arguments. So my pleasure at reading Professor Amar's analysis of the Court's decision in Romer v. Evans was only partly dampened by his disapproval of the respondents' brief that I and other plaintiffs' counsel filed with the Court. According to Amar, this respondents' brief provided the Court with "so little help" that it had to rely on an entirely different and much …