Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1)
- ADA (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Bell (1)
- Benjamin R. Black (1)
-
- Black (1)
- Case law (1)
- Circuits (1)
- Conditions of confinement (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional right (1)
- DOCCS (1)
- Deliberate indifference standard (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Due process (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Excessive force claims (1)
- Felicia Mulholland (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Incarcerated individuals (1)
- Inmates (1)
- Jails (1)
- Kingsley v. Hendrickson (1)
- Medical Review Board (1)
- Medical care (1)
- Mental Health in Prison: The Unintended but Catastrophic Effects of Deinstitutionalization (1)
- Mental health care (1)
- Mental health conditions (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Fourteenth Amendment
Mental Health In Prison: The Unintended But Catastrophic Effects Of Deinstitutionalization, Felicia Mulholland
Mental Health In Prison: The Unintended But Catastrophic Effects Of Deinstitutionalization, Felicia Mulholland
Touro Law Review
Prisons and jails are not adequately equipped to manage the ever-growing population of mentally ill inmates. Despite deinstitutionalization efforts, prisons have steadily become the new psychiatric hospitals and unfortunately, because of the lack of treatment and the ability to properly supervise this population of inmates, these individuals are dying by their own hands at an alarming rate. This Note argues that the lack of proper care for mentally ill inmates is a violation of their constitutional right, despite their incarcerated status. The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) should incorporate more concrete and universal rules and regulations for the …
Subjectively Speaking, The Applicable Standard For Deficient Medical Treatment Of Pretrial Detainees Should Be One Of Objective Reasonableness, Benjamin R. Black
Subjectively Speaking, The Applicable Standard For Deficient Medical Treatment Of Pretrial Detainees Should Be One Of Objective Reasonableness, Benjamin R. Black
Touro Law Review
There is no uniformity amongst the circuits when it comes to pretrial detainees claims for inadequate medical care. The circuits are currently grappling with this problem, applying two separate tests to pretrial detainees’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims depending on the jurisdiction in which the incident arose. The test that should be applied across all circuits is one of objective reasonableness. However, some circuits do not see it that way, applying the deliberate indifference standard, also known as the subjective standard test. The circuits applying the subjective standard are relying on case law that does not properly analyze the rights …