Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Animal cruelty (1)
- Animal welfare (1)
- Arkansas (1)
- Body of Liberties (1)
- CARES (1)
-
- COVID (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Commerce Clause (1)
- DSHEA (1)
- Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (1)
- Dietary supplement (1)
- FDA (1)
- FFCRA (1)
- FNS (1)
- Food and Drug Administration (1)
- Food and Nutrition Service (1)
- NSLP (1)
- National School Lunch Program (1)
- Pork (1)
- Prop 12 (1)
- Proposition 12 (1)
- Regulation (1)
- SNAP (1)
- School breakfast (1)
- School lunch (1)
- School meals (1)
- Special Supplemental Nutrition (1)
- Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (1)
- Supplements (1)
- The Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Food and Drug Law
Free For All: Proposing Legislation To Eliminate Food Insecurity In Arkansas Public Schools, A. Mills Bryant
Free For All: Proposing Legislation To Eliminate Food Insecurity In Arkansas Public Schools, A. Mills Bryant
Journal of Food Law & Policy
Schools serve millions of students daily as one of the largest food distribution sites in the United States. However, more than 13.1 million children in the United States, and almost 150,000 in Arkansas, are food insecure. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most Arkansas schools offered free and reduced lunch to students at or below the poverty line through participation in the National School Lunch Program (“NSLP”). During COVID-19, Congress passed The Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) and The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”) (hereinafter “The Acts”). This legislation effectively eliminated food insecurity in participating American public schools, …
Chewing The Welfare Cud: A Digested Analysis Of A Consumer Versus Producer-Defined Standard Of Welfare Practices In Animals Raised For Human Consumption, Caitlin C. Robb
Chewing The Welfare Cud: A Digested Analysis Of A Consumer Versus Producer-Defined Standard Of Welfare Practices In Animals Raised For Human Consumption, Caitlin C. Robb
Journal of Food Law & Policy
Since the eighteenth century, animal well-being remains a concern for American citizens. Yet, underlying this concern is the thought that while humans should not be cruel to animals, animals are still private property subject to human ownership. Therefore, multi-faceted questions of what constitutes “animal welfare” find a place in modern American debate. One such question becomes: should the producer or the consumer define welfare practice standards of animals raised for human consumption?7 This note provides an answer to this question by first analyzing the robust history of animal welfare in the United States, along with the domestic and international impact …
Re-Regulating Dietary Supplements, Jessie L. Bekker, Alex Flores, Michael S. Sinha
Re-Regulating Dietary Supplements, Jessie L. Bekker, Alex Flores, Michael S. Sinha
Journal of Food Law & Policy
In 1994, Congress introduced the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) to create a regulatory framework for the dietary supplement industry. Despite the increased market size of dietary supplements, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) pre-market authority to regulate the introduction of dietary supplements into the stream of commerce has remained subdued. Under DSHEA, the FDA has limited authority to review dietary supplements before entering the market. Unlike pharmaceuticals, which must be proven safe and effective prior to approval and marketing, dietary supplements can be sold to consumers without such reassurances. We call on Congress to amend DSHEA to …
The Contradictory Nature Of U.S. Laws And Nutrition Programs And Their Effects On Infant Feeding, Lily Patel
The Contradictory Nature Of U.S. Laws And Nutrition Programs And Their Effects On Infant Feeding, Lily Patel
Journal of Food Law & Policy
The contradictory nature of U.S. laws, including the laws concerning infant feeding, though supposedly aligned with policies to promote wellness in Americans, can exacerbate gender and race inequality and work against the National Strategy. The overarching goal of U.S. laws concerning infant feeding is to ensure that infants are fed, nourished, and receive proper nutrition. However, the laws often appear to be directly contradictory to one another in the priorities they are promoting.
Journal Of Food Law & Policy - Fall 2023, Journal Editors
Journal Of Food Law & Policy - Fall 2023, Journal Editors
Journal of Food Law & Policy
No abstract provided.