Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Agency (1)
-
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Cultural Heritage Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Torts (1)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- Algorithmic Lending (1)
- Behavioral Theory (1)
- Brandenburg (1)
- Censorship (1)
-
- Clear and Present Danger (1)
- Commercial Speech Doctrine (1)
- Fairness Doctrine (1)
- Free Exercise Clause (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Government Suppression (1)
- Guardian (1)
- Hate Speech (1)
- Incitement (1)
- Indigenous (1)
- John Stuart Mill (1)
- Legal Construct (1)
- Legal Personhood (1)
- Maori (1)
- New Zealand (1)
- Sioux (1)
- Socioecoomic Class (1)
- Standing (1)
- Standing Rock (1)
- Surcharge Ban (1)
- The Smith Act (1)
- Tolerance (1)
- Tribe (1)
- Whanganui River Claims Settlement (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Standing For Standing Rock?: Vindicating Native American Religious And Land Rights By Adapting New Zealand's Te Awa Tupua Act To American Soil, Malcolm Mcdermond
Standing For Standing Rock?: Vindicating Native American Religious And Land Rights By Adapting New Zealand's Te Awa Tupua Act To American Soil, Malcolm Mcdermond
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
On February 23, 2017, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (“Tribe”) was forced to disband its nearly year-long protest against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, which threatened the integrity of its ancestral lands. The Tribe sought declaratory and injunctive relief in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, but the court ruled against the Tribe and failed to protect its interests. While the United States was forcibly removing Indigenous protesters, other countries were taking steps to protect Indigenous populations. In unprecedented legislative action, New Zealand took radical steps to protect the land and cultural rights of …
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Whose Market Is It Anyway? A Philosophy And Law Critique Of The Supreme Court’S Free-Speech Absolutism, Spencer Bradley
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In the wake of Charlottesville, the rise of the alt-right, and campus controversies, the First Amendment has fallen into public scrutiny. Historically, the First Amendment’s “marketplace of ideas” has been a driving source of American political identity; since Brandenburg v. Ohio, the First Amendment protects all speech from government interference unless it causes incitement. The marketplace of ideas allows for the good and the bad ideas to enter American society and ultimately allows the people to decide their own course.
Yet, is the First Amendment truly a tool of social progress? Initially, the First Amendment curtailed war-time dissidents and …
Private Interests, Public Law, And Reconfigured Inequality In Modern Payment Card Networks, Stephen Wilks
Private Interests, Public Law, And Reconfigured Inequality In Modern Payment Card Networks, Stephen Wilks
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
This Article examines two phenomena contributing to the racial stratification of consumers in credit card markets. The first phenomenon pertains to the longstanding conflict between card issuers and merchants over payment processing cost allocation. If successful, First Amendment challenges to existing statutory surcharge bans will allow merchants to impose an additional fee when consumers use credit cards as a form of payment. The Article relies on the interplay between socioeconomic class and behavioral theory to suggest subsistence borrowers would be more likely to pay surcharge fees than wealthier consumers. This arrangement disfavors the poor to support a hierarchy of borrowers, …