Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual property (2)
- Internet (2)
- ACPA (1)
- Brookfield (1)
- Commercial speech (1)
-
- Conflict of laws (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Cyberspace (1)
- Cybersquatting (1)
- Dilution (1)
- Domain name (1)
- Ecommerce (1)
- Eminent domain (1)
- Fifth amendment (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Initial interest (1)
- Initial interest confusion (1)
- Lanham Act (1)
- Metatags (1)
- Online (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Property (1)
- Takings (1)
- Technology (1)
- Torts (1)
- Trademark (1)
- Trademark law (1)
- Trademarks (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Whither Copyright? Transformative Use, Free Speech, And An Intermediate Liability Proposal, John Tehranian
Whither Copyright? Transformative Use, Free Speech, And An Intermediate Liability Proposal, John Tehranian
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Initial Interest Confusion: Standing At The Crossroads Of Trademark Law, Jennifer E. Rothman
Initial Interest Confusion: Standing At The Crossroads Of Trademark Law, Jennifer E. Rothman
All Faculty Scholarship
While the benchmark of trademark infringement traditionally has been a demonstration that consumers are likely to be confused by the use of a similar or identical trademark to identify the goods or services of another, a court-created doctrine called initial interest confusion allows liability for trademark infringement solely on the basis that a consumer might initially be interested, attracted, or distracted by a competitor's, or even a non-competitor's, product or service. Initial interest confusion is being used with increasing frequency, especially on the Internet, to shut down speech critical of trademark holders and their products and services, to prevent comparative …
Recent Developments In Trademark Law: Confusion, Free Speech And The Question Of Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 387 (2005), Chad J. Doellinger
Recent Developments In Trademark Law: Confusion, Free Speech And The Question Of Use, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 387 (2005), Chad J. Doellinger
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The Supreme Court’s continued trend of refining trademark rights combined with a new concern for free speech and expression brings current and unresolved trademark issues to light. The large amount of activity in the development of trademark law in 2004 has brought additional uncertainty to trademark law. This article discusses recent Supreme Court trademark jurisprudence refining trademark rights, the development of recent trademark dilution cases, the role of use in commerce as applied to internet search engines and keyword issues, and the emphasis on free speech and expression.
The Constitutional Failing Of The Anticybersquatting Act, Ned Snow
The Constitutional Failing Of The Anticybersquatting Act, Ned Snow
Faculty Publications
Eminent domain and thought control are occurring in cyberspace. Through the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), the government transfers domain names from domain-name owners to private parties based on the owners' bad-faith intent. The owners receive no just compensation. The private parties who are recipients of the domain names are trademark holders whose trademarks correspond with the domain names. Often the trademark holders have no property rights in those domain names: trademark law only allows mark holders to exclude others from making commercial use of their marks; it does not allow mark holders to reserve the marks for their own …
Regulating The Regulators: The Impact Of Fda Regulation On Corporations' First Amendment Rights, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (2005), Lisa M. Fealk-Stickler
Regulating The Regulators: The Impact Of Fda Regulation On Corporations' First Amendment Rights, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (2005), Lisa M. Fealk-Stickler
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.