Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Privacy Law (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Water Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (5)
- Free Speech (3)
- Constitution (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
-
- Abortion (1)
- American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees (1)
- American Jurisprudence (1)
- Border (1)
- Branding Theory (1)
- CBP (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Customs and Border Protection (1)
- DNGOs (1)
- Data Protection Regulation (1)
- Data Security (1)
- Democrats (1)
- Digital Footprints (1)
- Dimensions of Freedom (1)
- Domestic Nongovernmental Organizations (1)
- Donald Trump (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Electoral Politics (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Establishment Clause (1)
- FNGOs (1)
- Facebook (1)
- Family Planning (1)
- Foreign Aid (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
The Fourth Amendment At Home, Thomas P. Crocker
The Fourth Amendment At Home, Thomas P. Crocker
Indiana Law Journal
A refuge, a domain of personal privacy, and the seat of familial life, the home holds a special place in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Supreme Court opinions are replete with statements affirming the special status of the home. Fourth Amendment text places special emphasis on securing protections for the home in addition to persons, papers, and effects against unwarranted government intrusion. Beyond the Fourth Amendment, the home has a unique place within constitutional structure. The home receives privacy protections in addition to sheltering other constitutional values protected by the Due Process Clause and the First Amendment. For example, under the Due …
"Water Is Life!" (And Speech!): Death, Dissent, And Democracy In The Borderlands, Jason A. Cade
"Water Is Life!" (And Speech!): Death, Dissent, And Democracy In The Borderlands, Jason A. Cade
Indiana Law Journal
Decades of stringent immigration enforcement along the Southwest border have pushed migrants into perilous desert corridors. Thousands have died in border regions, out of the general public view, yet migrants continue to attempt the dangerous crossings. In response to what they see as a growing humanitarian crisis, activists from organizations such as No More Deaths seek to expand migrant access to water, to honor the human remains of those who did not survive the journey, and to influence public opinion about border enforcement policies. Government officials, however, have employed a range of tactics to repress this border-policy "dissent," including blacklists, …
Measuring Trademark Dilution By Tarnishment, Suneal Bedi, David Reibstein
Measuring Trademark Dilution By Tarnishment, Suneal Bedi, David Reibstein
Indiana Law Journal
The law of trademark tarnishment—a type of trademark dilution—is in disarray. The
basic definition is deceptively simple. Trademark tarnishment occurs when a junior
mark harms the reputation of a substantially similar existing senior trademark by
associating itself with something perverse or deviant. However, it turns out that
Congress and the courts disagree over the prima facie evidence necessary to prove
its existence. The problem is that federal law and related legal principles are simply
ill-equipped to adequately analyze this unique market-driven doctrine. To make
matters worse, legal scholars cannot even agree on whether trademark tarnishment
can empirically exist in the …
Policing The Wombs Of The World's Women: The Mexico City Policy, Samantha Lalisan
Policing The Wombs Of The World's Women: The Mexico City Policy, Samantha Lalisan
Indiana Law Journal
This Comment argues that the Policy should be repealed because it undermines
firmly held First Amendment values and would be considered unconstitutional if
applied to domestic nongovernmental organizations (DNGOs). It proceeds in four
parts. Part I describes the inception of the Policy and contextualizes it among other
antiabortion policies that resulted as a backlash to the U.S. Supreme Court’s
landmark decision in Roe v. Wade. Part II explains the Policy’s actual effect on
FNGOs, particularly focusing on organizations based in Nepal and Peru, and argues
that the Policy undermines democratic processes abroad and fails to achieve its stated
objective: reducing …
Sharenting And The (Potential) Right To Be Forgotten, Keltie Haley
Sharenting And The (Potential) Right To Be Forgotten, Keltie Haley
Indiana Law Journal
Part I of this Note serves as an evaluation of parental use of social media and
further seeks to draw attention to the social and developmental impact parental
oversharing can have on children. Part II examines the tension between parents’
constitutional rights to direct the upbringing of their children, as well as their First
Amendment interest in online expression, and their children’s interest in personal
data security and privacy. Part III provides an overview of the European Union’s
right to be forgotten framework in the sharenting context and considers the
plausibility of implementing such a framework in the United States. …
First Amendment “Harms”, Stephanie H. Barclay
First Amendment “Harms”, Stephanie H. Barclay
Indiana Law Journal
What role should harm to third parties play in the government’s ability to protect religious rights? The intuitively appealing “harm” principle has animated new theories advanced by scholars who argue that religious exemptions are indefensible whenever they result in cognizable harm to third parties. This third-party harm theory is gaining traction in some circles, particularly in light of the Supreme Court’s pending cases in Little Sisters of the Poor and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. While focusing on harm appears at first to provide an appealing, simple, and neutral principle for avoiding other difficult moral questions, the definition of harm …
Speech Inequality After Janus V. Afscme, Charlotte Garden
Speech Inequality After Janus V. Afscme, Charlotte Garden
Indiana Law Journal
This Article explores the growing divide between the Roberts Court’s treatment of the free speech rights of wealthy individuals and corporations in campaign finance cases as compared to its treatment of the rights of public-sector labor unions and their members. First, it highlights some internal contradictions in the Janus Court’s analysis. Then, it discusses the growing—yet mostly ignored—divergence in the Court’s treatment of corporate and labor speakers with respect to the use of market influence to achieve political influence.
The Article has two Parts. In Part I, I explain how the Court reached its decision in Janus before critiquing the …