Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (3)
- Constitution (2)
- Free Speech (2)
- 1st Amendment (1)
- Cardozo (1)
-
- Civil rights (1)
- Compelled Disclosure (1)
- Compelled Speech (1)
- Connick v. Myers (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Employees (1)
- Employers' Fire Ins. Co. v. Consolidated Garage (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Government Employees (1)
- In Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. (1)
- J. (1)
- Labor (1)
- Labor Injunction (1)
- Labor Law (1)
- Labor Speech (1)
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Dairies (1)
- Ministerial Exemption (1)
- NIFLA (1)
- National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. Becerra (1)
- Nugent v. Union Automobile Ins. Co. (1)
- Public officers (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Right to Speak (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Ministerial Employees And Discrimination Without Remedy, Charlotte Garden
Ministerial Employees And Discrimination Without Remedy, Charlotte Garden
Indiana Law Journal
The Supreme Court first addressed the ministerial exemption in a 2012 case, Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC. The ministerial exemption is a defense that religious employers can invoke in discrimination cases brought by employees who qualify as “ministerial,” and it is rooted in the First Amendment principle that government cannot interfere in a church’s choice of minister. However, Hosanna-Tabor did not set out a test to determine which employees are covered by this exemption, and the decision was susceptible to a reading that the category was narrow. In 2020, the Court again took up the ministerial exemption, …
Compelled Disclosure And The Workplace Rights It Enables, Catherine Fisk
Compelled Disclosure And The Workplace Rights It Enables, Catherine Fisk
Indiana Law Journal
Worker and consumer protection laws often rely on the regulated entity to notify workers or consumers of their legal rights because it is effective and efficient to provide information at the time and place where it is most likely to be useful. Until the Supreme Court ruled in NIFLA v. Becerra in 2018 that a California law regulating crisis pregnancy centers was an unconstitutional speaker-based, contentdiscriminatory regulation of speech, mandatory disclosure laws were constitutionally uncontroversial economic regulation. Yet, the day after striking down a disclosure law in NIFLA, the Court in Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 expanded the right of …
Connick V. Myers: New Restrictions On The Free Speech Rights Of Government Employees, Peter C. Mccabe Iii
Connick V. Myers: New Restrictions On The Free Speech Rights Of Government Employees, Peter C. Mccabe Iii
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.