Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

First Amendment Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Faculty Publications

Obscenity

Articles 1 - 5 of 5

Full-Text Articles in First Amendment

Codifying The First Amendment: New York V. Ferber, Frederick Schauer Jan 1982

Codifying The First Amendment: New York V. Ferber, Frederick Schauer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Response: Pornography And The First Amendment, Frederick Schauer Jul 1979

Response: Pornography And The First Amendment, Frederick Schauer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Private Speech And The Private Forum: Givhan V. Western Line School District, Frederick Schauer Jan 1979

Private Speech And The Private Forum: Givhan V. Western Line School District, Frederick Schauer

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Speech And Speech - Obscenity And Obscenity: An Exercise In The Interpretation Of Constitutional Language, Frederick Schauer Jan 1979

Speech And Speech - Obscenity And Obscenity: An Exercise In The Interpretation Of Constitutional Language, Frederick Schauer

Faculty Publications

Commentators have criticized the Supreme Court's use of the "two-level" theory of speech to place obscenity beyond the pale of the first amendment. They charge the Court with shirking the task of balancing first amendment values and the states' interests in regulating obscene material. Professor Schauer meets this criticism by examining the meaning of the word "speech" in the context of the purposes of the first amendment and the Constitution as a whole. He concludes that "speech"does not include a category.of obscenity'that performs the function of a surrogate sexual act and is lacking in communicative content. The Court's treatment of …


Civilizing Pornography: The Case For An Exclusive Obscenity Nuisance Statute, Doug R. Rendleman Apr 1977

Civilizing Pornography: The Case For An Exclusive Obscenity Nuisance Statute, Doug R. Rendleman

Faculty Publications

Criminal penalties are increasingly perceived to be too severe for regulating obscenity. Professor Rendleman shares this perception and suggests that we replace criminal obscenity laws with an exclusive civil sanction utilizing injunctions. He proposes a comprehensive nuisance statute and discusses the various issues that arise in the equitable regulation of pornography.