Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (4)
- First Amendment (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Freedom of speech (3)
- Obscenity (3)
-
- Supreme Court (3)
- Congress (2)
- Content (2)
- Federal (2)
- Free Speech (2)
- Injunctions (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Nudity (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Women (2)
- Adult (1)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Alcohol (1)
- Alcoholic beverages (1)
- Anti-Abortion (1)
- Anti-SOCE laws (1)
- Banning Sex Change (1)
- Bar (1)
- Barnes (1)
- Bars (1)
- Becerra (1)
- California (1)
- Civil Disobedience (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Clinic (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Testing The First Amendment Validity Of Laws Banning Sexual Orientation Change Efforts On Minors: What Level Of Scrutiny Applies After Becerra And Does A Proportionality Approach Provide A Solution?, Clay Calvert
Pepperdine Law Review
This Article examines the standard of scrutiny courts should apply when testing the validity of laws banning speech-based sexual orientation change efforts (SOCE) against First Amendment challenges. Justice Clarence Thomas’s 2018 opinion for a five-justice conservative majority of the United States Supreme Court in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra casts considerable doubt on whether a level of inquiry less stringent than strict scrutiny applies. The article analyzes how lower courts after Becerra that have reviewed anti-SOCE laws disagree on the issue. And yet, as the Article explains, the Supreme Court refuses to clarify the muddle. First, …
A Primer On Hobby Lobby: For-Profit Corporate Entities’ Challenge To The Hhs Mandate, Free Exercise Rights, Rfra’S Scope, And The Nondelegation Doctrine, Terri R. Day, Leticia M. Diaz, Danielle Weatherby
A Primer On Hobby Lobby: For-Profit Corporate Entities’ Challenge To The Hhs Mandate, Free Exercise Rights, Rfra’S Scope, And The Nondelegation Doctrine, Terri R. Day, Leticia M. Diaz, Danielle Weatherby
Pepperdine Law Review
Earlier this term, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated case of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, the first of a litany of cases in which for-profit business entities are invoking the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("RFRA") in support of their claim that the Affordable Care Act’s HHS Mandate violates their freedom of religion. In particular, these plaintiffs argue that the Mandate’s requirement that employer-provided health insurance covers the costs of contraceptives, the "morning after" pill, and other fertility-related drugs conflicts with their deeply-held religious belief that life begins at conception and is, therefore, unconstitutional. …
California V. Larue: The Demise Of The “Bottomless” Bar , Doris M. Felman
California V. Larue: The Demise Of The “Bottomless” Bar , Doris M. Felman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sarong Gals: Green Light For The Red Light Abatement Law, Donald Lewis Briggs
Sarong Gals: Green Light For The Red Light Abatement Law, Donald Lewis Briggs
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ban On Nude Dancing Strips Away First Amendment Rights To Protect "Order And Morality" In Barnes V. Glen Theatre, Inc., Shannon Mclin Carlyle
Ban On Nude Dancing Strips Away First Amendment Rights To Protect "Order And Morality" In Barnes V. Glen Theatre, Inc., Shannon Mclin Carlyle
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Policy Against Federal Funding For Abortions Extends Into The Realm Of Free Speech After Rust V. Sullivan, Loye M. Barton
The Policy Against Federal Funding For Abortions Extends Into The Realm Of Free Speech After Rust V. Sullivan, Loye M. Barton
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Madsen V. Women's Health Center, Inc.: Striking An Unequal Balance Between The Right Of Women To Obtain An Abortion And The Right Of Pro-Life Groups To Freedom Of Expression, Keli N. Osaki
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Substance And Method In The Year 2000, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.