Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Copyright Clause (2)
- Folsom v. Marsh (2)
- Licensing Act of 1662 (2)
- Millar v. Taylor (2)
- Wheaton v. Peters (2)
-
- 1710 Statute of Anne (1)
- 1790 Copyright Act (1)
- 1909 Copyright Act (1)
- 1976 Copyright Act (1)
- Act Dealing with Copyright and Related Rights (1)
- Alfred Yen (1)
- Alternative burdens (1)
- Anglo-Saxon System of Copyright (1)
- BCIA (1)
- Baker v. Selden (1)
- Battle of the Booksellers (1)
- Berne Convention (1)
- Berne Convention Implementation Act (1)
- Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1)
- Betamax Case (1)
- Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. (1)
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc. (1)
- Common Law in England (1)
- Common law (1)
- Continental System of Copyright (1)
- Copyright Act of 1909 (1)
- Copyright Law (1)
- Court of Cassation (1)
- Donaldson v. Becket (1)
- Donaldson v. Beckett (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
An Analysis Of The Personal Use Principle Under Copyright Law, Hsin-Chih Cheng
An Analysis Of The Personal Use Principle Under Copyright Law, Hsin-Chih Cheng
LLM Theses and Essays
Personal use is when an individual uses a copyrighted work for private purposes, such as learning or entertainment. Personal use is a right given in the Copyright Clause of the U.S. Constitution, however, an issue arises when the individual wants to make a copy of the copyrighted work. New technologies like photocopying and videotaping make this issue more prominent today. Some copyright owners think that the individual’s copying for private use is harmful to their potential market and they argue for compensation. Does the individual have the right under the personal use principle to reproduce the copyrighted work for private …
Fair Use In American And Continental Laws, Omar M.A. Obeidat
Fair Use In American And Continental Laws, Omar M.A. Obeidat
LLM Theses and Essays
Intellectual property, unlike tangible property, does not exclusively occupy one place at a designated time. Instead, intellectual property is composed of information which can be reproduced or used in multiple places at any given time. This fundamental difference between intellectual and tangible property is reflected in the legal provisions that regulate these types of property. There are two dominant theories that justify the legal protection of intellectual property: the individualistic European approach, and the commercial Anglo-American approach. Under the European approach, the protection of the creation is a natural right guaranteed to the author. In other words, natural law guarantees …
Permissible Accommodation Of Religion And The Alternative Burden, Ei Ichiro Takahata
Permissible Accommodation Of Religion And The Alternative Burden, Ei Ichiro Takahata
LLM Theses and Essays
In this thesis, the author discusses the extent to which the government can afford to give accommodation within the limits of the Establishment Clause. In Chapter II, the author reviews the theory of the permissible accommodation referred to in the Supreme Court of the United States. In Chapter III, the author examines scholarly debates on the accommodation. Then, the author discusses German and Japanese law of the accommodation in Chapter IV. There, those cases suggest the possibility of alternative burdens on religious believers. The alternative burdens are considered the price of the accommodation. The author concludes that the government has …