Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Establishment Clause (3)
- Religion (3)
- First Amendment (2)
- Agostini v. Felton (1)
- Assimilationists (1)
-
- Charitable choice (1)
- Church and State (1)
- Church and state (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Conduit finance (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional theory Establishment clause Free exercise clause (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Education (1)
- Employment (1)
- Establishment clause (Constitutional law) (1)
- Everson v. Board of Education (1)
- Excessive entanglement test (1)
- Expressivist (1)
- Faith based (1)
- Faith-based initiatives (1)
- Free exercise clause (Constitutional law) (1)
- Freedom of Religion (1)
- Government contracting (1)
- Hunt v. McNair (1)
- Indoctrination (1)
- Lemon v. Kurtzman (1)
- Lynn v. Virginia College Building Authority (1)
- McClure (1)
- Mitchell v. Helms (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
"Charitable Choice" And The Accountability Challenge: Reconciling The Need For Regulation With The First Amendment Religion Clauses, Michele E. Gilman
"Charitable Choice" And The Accountability Challenge: Reconciling The Need For Regulation With The First Amendment Religion Clauses, Michele E. Gilman
All Faculty Scholarship
Since 1996, Congress has included charitable choice provisions in several social welfare statutes to encourage the participation of religious organizations in administering government-funded social service programs. In this Article, Professor Michele Gilman discusses the lack of accountability to beneficiaries that occurs when public funds are given to religious organizations for secular programs, and she proposes solutions to this problem. As Professor Gilman explains, doctrines that constrain abuses of governmental discretion, such as administrative procedure acts and constitutional restrictions, generally do not apply when public programs are privatized. Moreover, religious organizations are often insulated from public scrutiny because of First Amendment …
Ministerial Exception And Title Vii Claims: Case Law Grid Analysis, Janet S. Belcove-Shalin
Ministerial Exception And Title Vii Claims: Case Law Grid Analysis, Janet S. Belcove-Shalin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Revenue Bonds And Religious Education: The Constitutionality Of Conduit Financing Involving Pervasively Sectarian Institutions, Trent Collier
Revenue Bonds And Religious Education: The Constitutionality Of Conduit Financing Involving Pervasively Sectarian Institutions, Trent Collier
Michigan Law Review
The Establishment Clause - and particularly the issue of government funding of religious education - is one of the murkiest areas of Supreme Court jurisprudence. The Supreme Court has acknowledged as much, and the sharp divide in the Court's most recent forays into Establishment Clause territory illustrates the point that the current jurisprudential standards allow for a broad range of interpretation. There is some hope that the Supreme court will provide further clarification of its Establishment Clause standard in the near future. For now, however, it appears that the dominant mode of the Establishment Clause analysis is the examination of …
The Story Of A Forgotten Battle, Nathan B. Oman
The Story Of A Forgotten Battle, Nathan B. Oman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Distinctive Place Of Religious Entities In Our Constitutional Order, Ira C. Lupu, Robert Tuttle
The Distinctive Place Of Religious Entities In Our Constitutional Order, Ira C. Lupu, Robert Tuttle
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Unconstitutional Stereotype: Catholic Schools As Pervasively Sectarian, Gerard V. Bradley
An Unconstitutional Stereotype: Catholic Schools As Pervasively Sectarian, Gerard V. Bradley
Journal Articles
The Supreme Court first held public assistance to religious schools unconstitutional in 1971 in Lemon v. Kurtzman. From then until now the concept of “pervasively sectarian” has played a central role in “parochaid” jurisprudence; every holding against “direct” aid has rested upon it as a necessary premise. “Pervasively sectarian” refers to the assertedly religious (“sectarian”) character of the entire curriculum at parochial schools. Religion, it is said, so permeates the whole educational program that “direct aid” to any aspect of that program inescapably aids religion itself. And that, it is said, violates the Establishment Clause. Because aid statutes typically aim …
Faith And Funding: Toward An Expressivist Model Of The Establishment Clause, David Cole
Faith And Funding: Toward An Expressivist Model Of The Establishment Clause, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article seeks to provide an alternative to the polarization that so often characterizes debates about church and state. In Part I, the author suggests that there are good policy reasons for supporting faith-based initiatives, and that these reasons ought to be attractive to liberals and progressives, many of whom have opposed faith-based initiatives. Faith-based social services are, after all, social services, and are often the very types of welfare services that liberals and progressives tend to support. Core religious values--in particular, concern about the less fortunate, a belief in human dignity, and a commitment to the possibility of redemption--reinforce …
The Right Questions About School Choice: Education, Religious Freedom, And The Common Good, Richard W. Garnett
The Right Questions About School Choice: Education, Religious Freedom, And The Common Good, Richard W. Garnett
Journal Articles
As this Essay goes to press, the Supreme Court is considering whether Ohio's school-choice program violates the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In my view, the Ohio program is sound public policy, and it is consistent with the Justices' present understanding of the Establishment Clause. I also believe that the Court will and should permit this experiment, and our conversations about its merits, to continue. The purpose of this Essay, though, is not to predict or evaluate ex ante the Court's decision. Instead, my primary aim is to suggest and then sketch a few broad themes that--once the …