Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- First amendment (2)
- Public employees (2)
- 1983 litigation (1)
-
- 1st amendment (1)
- 2006 (1)
- Abood (1)
- Bishop (1)
- Bishop v. Wood (1)
- Blogging (1)
- Board of Regents v. Roth (1)
- Cannon v. City of West Palm Beach (1)
- Captive Audience Meetings (1)
- Captive audience meeting (1)
- Chemerinsky (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Connick v. Myers (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Contraception (1)
- Davenport (1)
- Davenport v. Washington Education Association (1)
- Deprivation of liberty interest (1)
- Deprivation of life liberty or property (1)
- Deprivation of property Ciambriello v. County of Nassau (1)
- Due process (1)
- Dues (1)
- Employee Free Choice (1)
- Employee speech (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
The Audacity Of Protecting Racist Speech Under The National Labor Relations Act, Michael Z. Green
The Audacity Of Protecting Racist Speech Under The National Labor Relations Act, Michael Z. Green
Michael Z. Green
This Article, written for a symposium hosted by the University of Chicago Legal Forum on the Disruptive Workplace, analyzes the most recent failures of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to determine a thoughtful and balanced approach in addressing racist speech. Imagine two employees in the private sector workplace are discussing the possibility of selecting a union to represent their interests regarding wages and working conditions. During this conversation, a black employee notes the importance of using their collective voices to improve working conditions and compares the activity of selecting a union with the Black Lives Matter protests aimed at …
The Role Of Law In Educational Decision Making - A Symposium - Introduction, Donald W. Dowd
The Role Of Law In Educational Decision Making - A Symposium - Introduction, Donald W. Dowd
Donald W. Dowd
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
An Overview Of The October 2006 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
An Overview Of The October 2006 Supreme Court Term, Erwin Chemerinsky
Erwin Chemerinsky
No abstract provided.
No Free Lunch, But Dinner And A Movie (And Contraceptives For Dessert)?, John C. Eastman
No Free Lunch, But Dinner And A Movie (And Contraceptives For Dessert)?, John C. Eastman
John C. Eastman
Captive Audience Meetings And Forced Listening: Lessons For Canada From The American Experience, Sara Slinn
Captive Audience Meetings And Forced Listening: Lessons For Canada From The American Experience, Sara Slinn
Sara Slinn
Widespread adoption of mandatory representation votes and express protection of employer speech invite employer anti-union campaigns during union organizing, including employer-held captive audience meetings. Therefore, the problem of whether and how to restrict employers’ captive audience communications during union organizing is of renewed relevance in Canada. Captive meetings are a long-standing feature of American labour relations. This article considers how treatment of captive meetings evolved in the U.S., including the notion of employee choice, the “marketplace of ideas” view of expression dominating the American debate, and the central role of the contest between constitutional and statutory rights. It also considers …
"Discrimination" On The Basis Of Religion: An Examination Of Attempted Value Neutrality In Employment, Laura S. Underkuffler
"Discrimination" On The Basis Of Religion: An Examination Of Attempted Value Neutrality In Employment, Laura S. Underkuffler
Laura S. Underkuffler
No abstract provided.
Employee Speech & Management Rights: A Counterintuitive Reading Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Elizabeth Dale
Employee Speech & Management Rights: A Counterintuitive Reading Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Elizabeth Dale
Elizabeth Dale
In the two years since the decision came down, courts and commentators generally have agreed that the Supreme Court's decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos sharply limited the First Amendment rights of public employees. In this Article, I argue that this widely shared interpretation overstates the case. The Court in Garcetti did not dramatically change the way it analyzed public employees' First Amendment rights. Instead, it restated the principles on which those claims rest, emphasizing management rights and the unconstitutional conditions doctrine. By making those two theories the centerpiece of the decision, the Court in Garcetti defined public employee speech rights …
Free Speech And Compulsory Union Fees: An Analysis Of Lehnert V. Ferris Faculty Association, Barbara J. Fick
Free Speech And Compulsory Union Fees: An Analysis Of Lehnert V. Ferris Faculty Association, Barbara J. Fick
Barbara J. Fick
This article previews the Supreme Court case Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Ass'n, 500 U.S. 507 (1991). The author expected the case to address the line between those types of activities that effectuate a union's duties as collective bargaining representative, and thus can be charged to non-members, and those activities that are not related to collective bargaining and therefore are not chargeable to objecting non-members.
Fired For Blogging: Are There Legal Protections For Employees Who Blog?, Robert Sprague
Fired For Blogging: Are There Legal Protections For Employees Who Blog?, Robert Sprague
Robert Sprague
No abstract provided.