Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (2)
- AHRC (1)
- ASIO (1)
- Abrams v. United States (1)
- Anti-Semitism (1)
-
- Australian Human Rights Commission (1)
- Australian Law Reform Commission report on Multiculturalism and the Law (1)
- Australian Security Intelligence Organization (1)
- Australian criminal law (1)
- Barry O’Farrell (1)
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Commonwealth racial vilification laws (1)
- Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (1)
- Crimes Act 1900 (1)
- Cross burning (1)
- ECAJ (1)
- Executive Council of Australian Jewry (1)
- False Statements (1)
- Federal Magistrates Court (1)
- First Amendment Protection (1)
- Free Speech (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of expression (1)
- Gail Mason (1)
- General Limitation Clause (1)
- High Court of Australia (1)
- ICCPR (1)
- ICERD (1)
- ICERD Committee (1)
- International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in First Amendment
Free Speech And Off-Label Rights, Amy J. Sepinwall
Free Speech And Off-Label Rights, Amy J. Sepinwall
Georgia Law Review
When a litigant invokes a constitutional right to
protect interests different from the ones underpinning
the right, he engages in what this Article calls an
off-label rights exercise. The Free Speech Clause has
recently become an especially prominent, and troubling,
site of off-label rights exercises. Two of the most
prominent cases in the Supreme Court’s last term
involved litigants who invoked their constitutional
rights to free speech to protect interests unrelated to
speech or expression. In Janus v. American Federation
of State, County, & Municipal Employees, a state
employee argued that forcing him to pay for the union’s
bargaining activities …
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
War Of The Words: Why False Statements Should Be Guaranteed First Amendment Protection, Virginia R. Priddy
War Of The Words: Why False Statements Should Be Guaranteed First Amendment Protection, Virginia R. Priddy
Georgia Law Review
In Haley v. State, the Georgia Supreme Court upheld
the conviction of Andrew Scott Haley for making a false
statement. Haley created a username and posted videos to
the Internet in which he claimed to have committed a
series of murders, goading his audience to try to solve the
"mysteries." Haley was convicted under a Georgia statute
that proscribes the making of a false statement within the
jurisdiction of an agency or department of state of Georgia.
After discussing the historical legal and philosophical
underpinnings of the First Amendment right to free
speech, this Note argues that the Georgia statute …
Smile For The Camera - The Long Lost Photos Of The Supreme Court At Work—And What They Reveal., Sonja R. West
Smile For The Camera - The Long Lost Photos Of The Supreme Court At Work—And What They Reveal., Sonja R. West
Popular Media
In a day when even our cellphones can capture images unobtrusively, why were we forced to stare at pixels on our computer screens or at a static televised image of the Supreme Court’s exterior? In 2012, why is there a wall of separation between the American people and their high court?
For decades, the debate over cameras in the court has gone something like this: the press pleads for permission and the court says no; academics make policy arguments that the court ignores; and Congress threatens to force cameras into the court, but the justices don’t blink. The argument remains …