Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Family Law
Why The American Child Welfare System Is Not Child Centered, Richard J. Gelles
Why The American Child Welfare System Is Not Child Centered, Richard J. Gelles
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of Liberal Ideology On Child Protection Reform, Cassie Statuto Bevan
The Impact Of Liberal Ideology On Child Protection Reform, Cassie Statuto Bevan
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Diagnosing Liberal Resistance To Needed Child Welfare Reforms, James G. Dwyer
Diagnosing Liberal Resistance To Needed Child Welfare Reforms, James G. Dwyer
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Thoughts On The Liberal Dilemma In Child Welfare Reform, Elizabeth Bartholet
Thoughts On The Liberal Dilemma In Child Welfare Reform, Elizabeth Bartholet
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Child Protection’S Parental Preference, Daniel Heimpel
Child Protection’S Parental Preference, Daniel Heimpel
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Stanley V. Illinois’S Untold Story, Josh Gupta-Kagan
Stanley V. Illinois’S Untold Story, Josh Gupta-Kagan
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Stanley v. Illinois is one of the Supreme Courts more curious landmark cases. The holding is well known: the Due Process Clause both prohibits states from removing children from the care of unwed fathers simply because they are not married and requires states to provide all parents with a hearing on their fitness. By recognizing strong due process protections for parents rights, Stanley reaffirmed Lochner-era cases that had been in doubt and formed the foundation of modern constitutional family law. But Peter Stanley never raised due process arguments, so it has long been unclear how the Court reached this decision. …
Form And Substance In Parentage Law, Lynn D. Wardle
Form And Substance In Parentage Law, Lynn D. Wardle
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Parentage At Birth: Birthfathers And Social Fatherhood, Nancy E. Dowd
Parentage At Birth: Birthfathers And Social Fatherhood, Nancy E. Dowd
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
A Child-Centered Approach To Parentage Law, James G. Dwyer
A Child-Centered Approach To Parentage Law, James G. Dwyer
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Constitutionality Of Best Interests Parentage, David D. Meyer
The Constitutionality Of Best Interests Parentage, David D. Meyer
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
To Protect And Defend: Assigning Parental Rights When Parents Are In Poverty, Karen Czapanskiy
To Protect And Defend: Assigning Parental Rights When Parents Are In Poverty, Karen Czapanskiy
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Parental Autonomy And Children's Welfare, Elizabeth S. Scott
Parental Autonomy And Children's Welfare, Elizabeth S. Scott
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Rights And Duties Of Childrearing, Peter Vallentyne
Rights And Duties Of Childrearing, Peter Vallentyne
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
A Taxonomy Of Children's Existing Rights In State Decision Making About Their Relationships, James G. Dwyer
A Taxonomy Of Children's Existing Rights In State Decision Making About Their Relationships, James G. Dwyer
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Which Ties Bind? Redefining The Parent-Child Relationship In An Age Of Genetic Certainty, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
Which Ties Bind? Redefining The Parent-Child Relationship In An Age Of Genetic Certainty, June Carbone, Naomi Cahn
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
What If I Want My Kids To Watch Pornography?: Protecting Children From "Indecent" Speech, Ashutosh Bhagwat
What If I Want My Kids To Watch Pornography?: Protecting Children From "Indecent" Speech, Ashutosh Bhagwat
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Under current First Amendment doctrine, a law directed at indecent speech is treated as "content-based" regulation of speech, and thus must satisfy the "strict scrutiny" test to survive constitutional challenge - the regulation must be narrowly tailored to advance a compelling state interest. A number of laws regulating indecent speech have been passed in recent years, and when challenged, the government has defended these regulations on the ground that the State has a compelling interest in the protection of children from harmful materials. Underlying this argument, however, is a deep ambiguity regarding the precise nature of the government's legitimate objectives …