Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
United States V. Salerno: An Examination Of Rule 804(B)(1), Judith M. Mercier
United States V. Salerno: An Examination Of Rule 804(B)(1), Judith M. Mercier
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Inadequate Interpreting Services In Courts And The Rules Of Admissibility Of Testimony On Extrajudicial Interpretations, Beth G. Lindie
Inadequate Interpreting Services In Courts And The Rules Of Admissibility Of Testimony On Extrajudicial Interpretations, Beth G. Lindie
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Admitting Confessions Of Codefendants: Has Lee V. Illinois Created An Additional Hearsay Exception?, Christine Noworyta
Admitting Confessions Of Codefendants: Has Lee V. Illinois Created An Additional Hearsay Exception?, Christine Noworyta
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Meaning Of "Bad Faith" Under The Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule, Peter F. Valori
The Meaning Of "Bad Faith" Under The Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule, Peter F. Valori
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Myself Alone: Individualizing Justice Through Psychological Character Evidence, Andrew E. Taslitz
Myself Alone: Individualizing Justice Through Psychological Character Evidence, Andrew E. Taslitz
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation: The Jury's Role In Resolving The Battle Of The Experts, Joseph C. Kohn
In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation: The Jury's Role In Resolving The Battle Of The Experts, Joseph C. Kohn
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Unanswered Questions Of Christophersen V. Allied-Signal Corp., Richard O. Faulk
The Unanswered Questions Of Christophersen V. Allied-Signal Corp., Richard O. Faulk
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Much Ado About Nothing - The Supreme Court Still Fails To Solve The General Acceptance Problem Regarding Expert Testimony And Scientific Evidence , Joseph B. Spero
Much Ado About Nothing - The Supreme Court Still Fails To Solve The General Acceptance Problem Regarding Expert Testimony And Scientific Evidence , Joseph B. Spero
Journal of Law and Health
This paper will discuss and analyze the problem of scientific evidence and expert testimony from Frye v. United States to the new grounds for admissibility established by the Supreme Court of the United States in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. This note will specifically focus on some of the changes made by the courts to the common law rule and follow its transformation to a more liberal standard within the federal court system. The paper will conclude that the courts have not really changed their position on the admissibility of scientific evidence and that their current criteria still are …
Deposing Expert Witnesses In Environmental Litigation, James B. Burns
Deposing Expert Witnesses In Environmental Litigation, James B. Burns
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Comment Of An Expert: Biomarker Evidence Following Exposure To Pollutants, A. C. Zahalski, P.R. Mcconnachie
Comment Of An Expert: Biomarker Evidence Following Exposure To Pollutants, A. C. Zahalski, P.R. Mcconnachie
Villanova Environmental Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Admissibility Of Expert Testimony On Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome In Kentucky, Michele Meyer Mccarthy
Admissibility Of Expert Testimony On Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome In Kentucky, Michele Meyer Mccarthy
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.