Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (1)
- Adversary System (1)
- BWC (1)
- Bias (1)
- Body Camera Perspective Effects (1)
-
- Body-Worn Cameras (1)
- Brady (1)
- CSI Effects (1)
- Camera Perspective Bias (1)
- City of Hays v. Vogt (1)
- Conflict of Interest (1)
- Consumer insolvency (1)
- Cooperation and Plea Agreement (1)
- Criminal Video Evidence (1)
- Data (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Dispositional Bias (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Duty (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Exculpatory Evidence (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Hiding the Ball (1)
- Historical institutionalism (1)
- Judicial Scrutiny (1)
- Limitations of Technology (1)
- Noise (1)
- Nondisclosure (1)
- Open File Policy (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Noisy "Silent Witness": The Misperception And Misuse Of Criminal Video Evidence, Aaron M. Williams
The Noisy "Silent Witness": The Misperception And Misuse Of Criminal Video Evidence, Aaron M. Williams
Indiana Law Journal
This Note examines recent developments in the research of situational video evidence biases. Part I examines the current and growing body of psychological research into the various situational biases that can affect the reliability of video evidence and the gaps in this research that require further attention from researchers and legal academics. Because these biases do not “operate in a vacuum,” Part I also examines some of the recent and exciting research into the interaction between situational and dispositional biases. Part II examines the development of camera and video processing technology and its limitations as a means of mitigating such …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Between Brady Discretion And Brady Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Between Brady Discretion And Brady Misconduct, Bennett L. Gershman
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland presented prosecutors with new professional challenges. In Brady, the Supreme Court held that the prosecution must provide the defense with any evidence in its possession that could be exculpatory. If the prosecution fails to timely turn over evidence that materially undermines the defendant’s guilt, a reviewing court must grant the defendant a new trial. While determining whether evidence materially undermines a defendant’s guilt may seem like a simple assessment, the real-life application of such a determination can be complicated. The prosecution’s disclosure determination can be complicated under the Brady paradigm because …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Clarifying The Scope Of The Self-Incrimination Clause: City Of Hays V. Vogt, Samantha Ruben
Clarifying The Scope Of The Self-Incrimination Clause: City Of Hays V. Vogt, Samantha Ruben
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Three months after oral arguments, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ of certiorari in City of Hays v. Vogt as improvidently granted. The question in Vogt was whether the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination is violated when incriminating statements are used at a probable cause hearing, as opposed to a criminal trial. As a result of the “DIG,” the Court left a circuit split unresolved surrounding the meaning of a “criminal case” within the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause.
This note argues that the Supreme Court should not have dismissed Vogt and should have decided that the Fifth Amendment right against …