Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (2)
- Fifth Amendment (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Allen v. The United States of America: The Substantial Connection between Nuclear Fallout and Cancer (1)
- Allen v. U.S. (1)
-
- Article 1 section 7 (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Cases (1)
- Causation (1)
- Cause-in-fact (1)
- Christoffel (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Daniel Swartzman (1)
- Decisionmaking (1)
- Dose response (1)
- Dosimetry (1)
- Duty-risk (1)
- Exposures (1)
- Fair trial (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Impeachment (1)
- Nuclear weapons (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Right to silence (1)
- Search (1)
- Seattle University (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Seizure (1)
- Silence (1)
- Standard of proof (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Admissibility Of Prior Silence To Impeach The Testimony Of Criminal Defendants, Rex A. Sharp
The Admissibility Of Prior Silence To Impeach The Testimony Of Criminal Defendants, Rex A. Sharp
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note focuses on whether a defendant who was called as a witness at the prior, severed trial of a codefendant and refused to testify by invoking the fifth amendment can subsequently be impeached by this silence at his own trial. In addition to the obvious implications this issue has for severed criminal trials, the factors considered when deciding whether impeachment by silence should be allowed generally are in sharpest focus in this factual setting. Thus, the analysis of the constitutional and evidentiary questions this Note enlists to argue that impeachment by silence in this context is permissible applies as …
Closing The "Open Fields" Question: Oliver V. United States, Brian K. Jorgensen
Closing The "Open Fields" Question: Oliver V. United States, Brian K. Jorgensen
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Allen V. The United States Of America: The “Substantial” Connection Between Nuclear Fallout And Cancer, Daniel Swartzman, Tom Christoffel
Allen V. The United States Of America: The “Substantial” Connection Between Nuclear Fallout And Cancer, Daniel Swartzman, Tom Christoffel
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Washington Search And Seizure Law, Justice Robert F. Utter
Survey Of Washington Search And Seizure Law, Justice Robert F. Utter
Seattle University Law Review
This Survey is designed to assist lawyers and judges who must argue and resolve search and seizure issues in Washington State. The Survey summarizes the controlling state and federal cases on search and seizure law and uses as an additional reference W. LAFAVE, Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment (1978). Washington courts are likely to analyze future search and seizure issues under both the fourth amendment and Washington Constitution article I, section 7. The difference in wording between the two provisions is substantial, suggesting different degrees or types of privacy protection. This Survey summarizes the predominant treatment …
Does A Criminal Defendant Have A Constitutional Right To Compel The Production Of Privileged Testimony Through Use Immunity, Louis M. Natali Jr.
Does A Criminal Defendant Have A Constitutional Right To Compel The Production Of Privileged Testimony Through Use Immunity, Louis M. Natali Jr.
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.