Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (3)
- Confessions (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Impeachment (2)
- Admissibility (1)
-
- Advisory Committee (1)
- Affidavits (1)
- Character evidence (1)
- Collateral matters (1)
- Communications (1)
- Consitutional interpretation (1)
- Credibility (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Electronic Surveillance (1)
- Evidence law (1)
- Exclusionary Rule (1)
- Exclusionary doctrine (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Extraneous prejudicial information (1)
- FRE Rule 606(b) (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Fruit of the poisonous tree (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Identification (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Proposed Rule Of Evidence 609: Impeachment Of Criminal Defendants By Prior Convictions, D. Joseph Hurson
Proposed Rule Of Evidence 609: Impeachment Of Criminal Defendants By Prior Convictions, D. Joseph Hurson
Washington Law Review
This comment describes current Washington law on the use of criminal convictions to impeach the testimony of criminal defendants and examines the factors which are relevant to the formation of a more acceptable rule. Adoption of the proposed rule would also affect the rules for impeaching nondefendant witnesses. Only a criminal defendant, however, is in jeopardy of actually being convicted as a result of a jury's misuse of evidence of prior convictions. Because the interests of the criminal defendant witness will be so drastically affected by the prior conviction rule which the Washington Supreme Court ultimately adopts, this comment will …
Women's Self-Defense Under Washington Law—State V. Wanrow, 88 Wn. 2d 221, 559 P.2d 548 (1977), Jennifer Marsh
Women's Self-Defense Under Washington Law—State V. Wanrow, 88 Wn. 2d 221, 559 P.2d 548 (1977), Jennifer Marsh
Washington Law Review
The Washington Supreme Court, in State v. Wanrow, examined the issue of self-defense for women under Washington law and held that the application of traditional self-defense rules resulted in prejudicial treatment of women defendants. This note will examine the meaning of the Wanrow decision and offer support for its holding in light of available psychological and sociological data. Additionally, this note will suggest a special analytical framework utilizing social science data to test accepted legal doctrines for latent sex discrimination. The importance of these data in exposing such discrimination will be shown by examining related cases in the area of …
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
Impeachment Of One's Own Witness By Prior Inconsistent Statements Under The Federal And Arkansas Rules Of Evidence, Samuel A. Perroni
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parker V. Randolph, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Parker V. Randolph, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Right To An In Camera Voluntariness Hearing: State V. Sanders, Ellen Carle Lilly
The Right To An In Camera Voluntariness Hearing: State V. Sanders, Ellen Carle Lilly
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Manson V. Brathwaite: Looking For The Silver Lining In The Area Of Eyewitness Identifications
Manson V. Brathwaite: Looking For The Silver Lining In The Area Of Eyewitness Identifications
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure - Statements Made During A Prearraignment Delay That Exceeds Six Hours Ruled Inadmissible In Pennsylvania, Carol J. Young
Criminal Procedure - Statements Made During A Prearraignment Delay That Exceeds Six Hours Ruled Inadmissible In Pennsylvania, Carol J. Young
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unprivileged Status Of The Fifth Amendment Privilege, Mark Berger
The Unprivileged Status Of The Fifth Amendment Privilege, Mark Berger
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Jurors' Impeachment Of Verdicts And Indictments In Federal Court Under Rule 606(B), Christopher B. Mueller
Jurors' Impeachment Of Verdicts And Indictments In Federal Court Under Rule 606(B), Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
An Examination Of The Naming Requirement Of Tittle Iii In Light Of United States V. Donovan - A Case For Suppression, William D. Goldberg
An Examination Of The Naming Requirement Of Tittle Iii In Light Of United States V. Donovan - A Case For Suppression, William D. Goldberg
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is The Exclusionary Rule An 'Illogical' Or 'Unnatural' Interpretation Of The Fourth Amendment?, Yale Kamisar
Is The Exclusionary Rule An 'Illogical' Or 'Unnatural' Interpretation Of The Fourth Amendment?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
More than 50 years have passed since the Supreme Court decided the Weeks case, barring the use in federal prosecutions of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and the Silverthorne case, invoking what has come to be known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine. The justices who decided those cases would, I think, be quite surprised to learn that some day the value of the exclusionary rule would be measured by-and the very life of the rule might depend on-an empirical evaluation of its efficacy in deterring police misconduct. These justices were engaged in a less …