Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Cross-examination (2)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Confrontation (1)
- Due Process (1)
-
- Evidence suppression (1)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (1)
- Federal agency (1)
- Grievance (1)
- Hannah v. Larche (1)
- Hearing (1)
- Injunction (1)
- Jencks v. United States (1)
- Lie detector (1)
- Map v. Ohio (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
- Notice (1)
- Past misconduct (1)
- Procedural right (1)
- Rea v. United States (1)
- Search and seizure (1)
- Self-incrimination (1)
- Steelworker Trilogy (1)
- Stefanelli v. Minard (1)
- Subpoena (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Transcript (1)
- Tribunal (1)
- Wiretapping (1)
- Witness (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Criminal Procedure - Search And Seizure - Federal Court Injunction Against State Officer To Suppress Illegally Obtained Evidence In State Court, S. Anthony Benton
Criminal Procedure - Search And Seizure - Federal Court Injunction Against State Officer To Suppress Illegally Obtained Evidence In State Court, S. Anthony Benton
Michigan Law Review
Federal customs enforcement officers suspected plaintiff of theft from a waterfront pier. In the course of their investigation they searched plaintiff's home without a search warrant and detained plaintiff for questioning without first bringing him before a federal commissioner. Both acts violated the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant, a state officer, although not a participant in the search, was present during the illegal detention at the invitation of the federal officers. Plaintiff obtained an order in federal district court enjoining defendant from giving any testimony or producing any evidence in state criminal proceedings against him with respect to property …
Some Problems Of Evidence Before The Labor Arbitrator, R. W. Fleming
Some Problems Of Evidence Before The Labor Arbitrator, R. W. Fleming
Michigan Law Review
Legal rules of evidence do not, of course, apply before the labor arbitrator. This is not surprising since such rules were developed in connection with jury trials, and do not apply strictly in any tribunal but a jury-court. The whole theory of the arbitration tribunal is that it is composed of experts who repeatedly inquire into a relatively homogeneous kind of cases. Exclusionary rules are hardly required as a precautionary measure. Indeed, as the late Harry Shulman said in his classic Oliver Wendell Holmes lecture at Harvard in 1955, "The more serious danger is not that the arbitrator will hear …
Federal Agency Investigations: Procedural Rights Of The Subpoenaed Witness, Frank C. Newman
Federal Agency Investigations: Procedural Rights Of The Subpoenaed Witness, Frank C. Newman
Michigan Law Review
This article is designed to help fill a gap in the literature and to warn government attorneys, particularly, about some questionable asides in the Hannah case. We shall not deal with record-keeping requirements or with agency inspections, subpoenas duces tecum, and related search and seizure problems. The focus instead is on the subpoenaed witness; that is, a man who knows that force may be used against him unless pursuant to government command he appears and answers questions. We examine several rights that may protect the witness; and we shall also ask whether the agencies, to discharge their governmental duties, truly …