Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- 985 Reasons to Comply with Discovery Requests (1)
- Achieving an Appropriate Balance: The Use of Counsel Sanctions in Connection with the Resolution of E- Discovery Misconduct (1)
- Anatomy of a Trial (1)
- Anything but Academic: How Copyright’s Work-for-Hire Doctrine Affects Professors Graduate Students and K-12 Teachers in the Information Age (1)
-
- Brady on Bank Checks (1)
- Busting Blocks: Revisiting 47 U.S.C. § 230 to Address the Lack of Effective Legal Recourse for Wrongful Inclusion in Spam Filters (1)
- Civil Rights and Responsibilities Under the Constitution (1)
- Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp. (1)
- Current and Emerging Transportation Technology: Final Nails in the Coffin of the Dying Right of Privacy? (1)
- Databases E-Discovery and Criminal Law (1)
- Decisions of the US Supreme Court (1)
- Disability Rights Council of Greater Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority (1)
- Do Not Track: Revising the EU’s Data Protection Framework to Require Meaningful Consent for Behavioral Advertising (1)
- ESI (1)
- Electronic Discovery (1)
- Electronic Discovery in Large Organizations (1)
- Electronically stored information (1)
- FRCP (1)
- Federal Practice and Procedure (1)
- Franchising (1)
- GFTM Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores (1)
- Interrogatories and Depositions in Virginia (1)
- Keir v. UnumProvident Corp. (1)
- Landmark Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency (1)
- Law And Poverty Cases and Materials (1)
- Linnen v. A.H. Robins Co. (1)
- Moore v. Publicis Groupe (1)
- Mt. Hawley (1)
- Public School Law Cases and Materials (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Technologies-That-Must-Not-Be-Named: Understanding And Implementing Advanced Search Technologies In E-Discovery, Jacob Tingen
Technologies-That-Must-Not-Be-Named: Understanding And Implementing Advanced Search Technologies In E-Discovery, Jacob Tingen
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were created to promote the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding.” Unfortunately, in the world of e-discovery, case determinations are often anything but speedy and inexpensive. The manual review process is notoriously one of the most expensive parts of litigation. Beyond expense, the time and effort required to carry out large-scale manual review places an immense burden on parties, nearly destroying the possibility of assessing the merits of early settlement before expensive review has already been carried out.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Francis C. Oroszlan
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Francis C. Oroszlan
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its second issue of the 2010–2011 academic year.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Ian Lambeets
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Ian Lambeets
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its first issue of the 2011-2012 academic year. The Journal strives to discuss new and emerging issues that fall squarely at the intersection of technology and the law. Another year goes by and technology continues to advance, and not surprisingly, further immerses itself into our daily lives. The Journal believes it is our mission to recognize the practical effects the growth of technology has on society and to promote a relevant and timely discussion on these topics.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Jessica M. Yoke
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Jessica M. Yoke
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present the third issue of the 2008–2009 academic school year, which also is our Annual Survey on E-Discovery.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Neal H. Lewis
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Neal H. Lewis
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Welcome to the fourth issue and final of the Richmond Journal of Law & Technology for the 2005-2006 academic year. Volume 12, Issue 4 is the second publication of the Journal’s Annual Survey on Electronic Discovery. The topic of Electronic Discovery is particularly relevant considering the impending applicability of the proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Annual Survey Editor has worked extensively to bring together different commentary on Electronic Discovery.
A Duty Everlasting: The Perils Of Applying Traditional Doctrines Of Spoliation To Electronic Discovery, Michael R. Nelson, Mark H. Rosenberg
A Duty Everlasting: The Perils Of Applying Traditional Doctrines Of Spoliation To Electronic Discovery, Michael R. Nelson, Mark H. Rosenberg
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding electronic discovery are expected to take effect on December 1, 2006. These amendments are designed to alleviate the burden, expense and uncertainty that has resulted from the application of traditional discovery principles in the electronic age. These principles worked well in an era where discovery was primarily limited to the production of paper documentation, but have proved unworkable when applied to the discovery of electronic data, particularly in the “corporate world,” where even the most routine business discussions are captured in electronic format.5
Books Received
University of Richmond Law Review
These are the books received by the Law School in 1970.