Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- Annual Survey of Electronic Discovery (1)
- Backup Tapes: You Can’t Live With Them and You Can’t Live Without Them (1)
- Convolve Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corporation (1)
- E-Discovery Amendments (1)
-
- ESI (1)
- In Pursuit of FRCP 1: Creative Approaches to Cutting and Shifting the Costs of E-Discovery (1)
- In re Celexa and Lexapro Products Liability Litigation (1)
- Information Inflation: Can the Legal System Adapt? (1)
- Infotopia (1)
- Johannes Gutenberg (1)
- Kentucky Speedway LLC v. National Association of Stock Car Auto Racing (1)
- Managing Preservation Obligations After the 2006 Federal E-Discovery Amendments: The Litigation Hold Process in the ESI Era (1)
- OCR (1)
- Optical character recognition (1)
- PDF (1)
- Philosophical Investigations (1)
- Phoenix Four Inc. v. Strategic Resources Corporation (1)
- Portable Document Format (1)
- TIFF (1)
- Tagged Image File Format (1)
- The 2006 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure: Accessible and Inaccessible Electronic Information Storage Devices: Why Parties Should Store Electronic Information in Accessible Formats (1)
- The “Two Tier” Discovery Provision of Rule 26(b)(2)(B): A Reasonable Measure for Controlling Electronic Discovery (1)
- Treppel v. Biovail Corp (1)
- Zubulake (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Information Inflation: Can The Legal System Adapt?, George L. Paul, Jason R. Baron
Information Inflation: Can The Legal System Adapt?, George L. Paul, Jason R. Baron
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Information is fundamental to the legal system. Accordingly, lawyers must understand that information, as a cultural and technological edifice, has profoundly and irrevocably changed. There has been a civilization- wide morph, or pulse, or one might say that information has evolved. This article discusses the new inflationary dynamic, which has caused written information to multiply by as much as ten thousand-fold recently. The resulting landscape has stressed the legal system and indeed, it is becoming prohibitively expensive for lawyers even to search through information. This is particularly true in litigation.
Managing Preservation Obligations After The 2006 Federal E-Discovery Amendments, Thomas Y. Allman
Managing Preservation Obligations After The 2006 Federal E-Discovery Amendments, Thomas Y. Allman
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The 2006 E-Discovery Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2006 Amendments or the Amendments) do not directly address the onset or scope of preservation obligations. As noted in the September 2005 Report of the Standing Committee of the Judicial Conference recommending adoption of the 2006 Amendments, preservation obligations “arise from independent sources of law” and are dependent upon “the substantive law of each jurisdiction.” However, the Amendments have a major impact on how parties must analyze and execute preservation obligations involving electronically stored information (“ESI”).
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Charlotte A. Dauphin
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Charlotte A. Dauphin
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
I hope you enjoy the third issue of the Richmond Journal of Law and Technology for the 2006-2007 academic year, our Annual Survey of Electronic Discovery. This is our first annual survey since the new amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which at the time of this publication have been in effect for several months, that affect electronic discovery in several significant ways. The entire staff of the Journal has worked diligently to bring these articles to our readers. Whether you are new to the Journal and electronic discovery, or whether you are a long-time reader, you will …