Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Society (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Courts (2)
-
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms (1)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (1)
- Business (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Communication (1)
- Communication Technology and New Media (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Corporate Finance (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (2)
- 1.6 (1)
- 3.5 (1)
- 4.1 (1)
- 4.2 (1)
-
- 4.3 (1)
- 5.3 (1)
- 7.2 (1)
- 7.3 (1)
- 7.4 (1)
- 8.4 (1)
- American Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20 (1)
- Arrestees (1)
- Avvo (1)
- Bail (1)
- Behavioral prediction (1)
- Bruce Kobayashi (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Corrections (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crime (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Criminal wrongdoing (1)
- DNA (1)
- DNA samples (1)
- DNA testing (1)
- Discovery retrenchment (1)
- Expedited discovery (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The Importance Of Being Dismissive: The Efficiency Role Of Pleading Stage Evaluation Of Shareholder Litigation, Lawrence A. Hamermesh, Michael L. Wachter
The Importance Of Being Dismissive: The Efficiency Role Of Pleading Stage Evaluation Of Shareholder Litigation, Lawrence A. Hamermesh, Michael L. Wachter
All Faculty Scholarship
It has been claimed that the risk/reward dynamics of shareholder litigation have encouraged quick settlements with substantial attorneys’ fee awards but no payment to shareholders, regardless of the merits of the case. Fee-shifting charter and bylaw provisions may be too blunt a tool to control agency costs associated with excessive shareholder litigation, and are in any event now prohibited by Delaware statute. We claim, however, that active judicial supervision of public company shareholder litigation at an early stage reduces the costs of frivolous litigation to shareholders by separating meritorious from unmeritorious litigation before the full costs of discovery are incurred. …
Dna By The Entirety, Natalie Ram
Dna By The Entirety, Natalie Ram
All Faculty Scholarship
The law fails to accommodate the inconvenient fact that an individual’s identifiable genetic information is involuntarily and immutably shared with her close genetic relatives. Legal institutions have established that individuals have a cognizable interest in controlling genetic information that is identifying to them. The Supreme Court recognized in Maryland v. King that the Fourth Amendment is implicated when arrestees’ DNA is analyzed, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act protects individuals from genetic discrimination in the employment and health-insurance markets. But genetic information is not like other forms of private or personal information because it is shared — immutably and involuntarily …
Proportionality And The Social Benefits Of Discovery: Out Of Sight And Out Of Mind?, Stephen B. Burbank
Proportionality And The Social Benefits Of Discovery: Out Of Sight And Out Of Mind?, Stephen B. Burbank
All Faculty Scholarship
In this short essay, based on remarks delivered at the 2015 meeting of the AALS Section of Litigation, I use a recent paper by Gelbach and Kobayashi to highlight the risk that, in assessing the proportionality of proposed discovery under the 2015 amendments to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, federal judges will privilege costs over benefits, and private over public interests. The risk arises from the temptation to focus on (1) the interests of those who are present to the detriment of the interests of those who are absent (“the availability heuristic”), and (2) variables that …
Neuroprediction: New Technology, Old Problems, Stephen J. Morse
Neuroprediction: New Technology, Old Problems, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
Neuroprediction is the use of structural or functional brain or nervous system variables to make any type of prediction, including medical prognoses and behavioral forecasts, such as an indicator of future dangerous behavior. This commentary will focus on behavioral predictions, but the analysis applies to any context. The general thesis is that using neurovariables for prediction is a new technology, but that it raises no new ethical issues, at least for now. Only if neuroscience achieves the ability to “read” mental content will genuinely new ethical issues be raised, but that is not possible at present.
Using The Dna Testing Of Arrestees To Reevaluate Fourth Amendment Doctrine, Steven P. Grossman
Using The Dna Testing Of Arrestees To Reevaluate Fourth Amendment Doctrine, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
With the advent of DNA testing, numerous issues have arisen with regard to obtaining and using evidence developed from such testing. As courts have come to regard DNA testing as a reliable method for linking some people to crimes and for exonerating others, these issues are especially significant. The federal government and most states have enacted statutes that permit or direct the testing of those convicted of at least certain crimes. Courts have almost universally approved such testing, rejecting arguments that obtaining and using such evidence violates the Fourth Amendment.
More recently governments have enacted laws permitting or directing the …
Making "Friends" With The #Ethics Rules: Avoiding Pitfalls In Professional Social Media Use, Cynthia Laury Dahl
Making "Friends" With The #Ethics Rules: Avoiding Pitfalls In Professional Social Media Use, Cynthia Laury Dahl
All Faculty Scholarship
Lawyers’ professional use of social media is widespread and a critical component to running a successful practice. Yet some common uses of social media easily – and often innocently -- violate the professional rules of ethics. The American Bar Association recently passed amendments to the Model Rules of Professional Conduct to include topics related to social media use, but the amendments still do not address all issues. Likewise, advisory opinions of state and local bar associations and court opinions give scant and sometimes contradictory advice about when a use does or does not violate a Rule. This essay discusses four …