Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Washington School of Law

1931

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Evidence

Admissibility Of Previous Consistent Statements By A Witness, Herald A. O'Neill Jul 1931

Admissibility Of Previous Consistent Statements By A Witness, Herald A. O'Neill

Washington Law Review

Today the courts are almost unanimous in holding that proof of statements made by a witness out of court similar to and in harmony with his testimony are inadmissible. "This rule of evidence," said Mr. Justice Holloway, speaking for the Supreme Court of Montana in the case of Fairleigh v.Kelley (1903), "became settled long ago." It is unquestionably supported by the decided weight of authority, and in fact, it may now be said that the rule is more than general—it is well nigh universal. There are, however, well settled exceptions to this general rule. In fact, the exceptions "have become …


Degrees Of Secondary Evidence, Story Birdseye Feb 1931

Degrees Of Secondary Evidence, Story Birdseye

Washington Law Review

One of.the most ancient of all legal doctrines is the "best evidence rule," although originally it had a much broader meaning than at present. According to the early view, it meant that only the best evidence which could be produced was admissible, it was applicable to all classes of evidence and not confined to documents. In its modern application, however, the best evidence rule amounts only to the requirement that the contents of a written instrument must be proved by the introduction of the writing itself, unless its absence is satisfactorily accounted for. The reason for this law of evidence …