Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (1)
- Christophersen v. Allied Signal Corp. (1)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1)
- DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1)
- Ellis v. International Playtex (1)
-
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Frye v. United States (1)
- United States v. Baker (1)
- United States v. Beddow (1)
- United States v. Blackman (1)
- United States v. Breque (1)
- United States v. Campbell (1)
- United States v. Fuller (1)
- United States v. Gallo (1)
- United States v. Jackson (1)
- United States v. Jakobetz (1)
- United States v. Julio Piccinonna (1)
- United States v. Koller (1)
- United States v. Long (1)
- United States v. Martin (1)
- United States v. Metzger (1)
- United States v. Munoz-Rumo (1)
- United States v. Sanders (1)
- United States v. Smith (1)
- United States v. Two Bulls (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Money Laundering And Drug Trafficking: A Question Of Understanding The Elements Of The Crime And The Use Of Circumstantial Evidence, Thomas M. Dibiagio
Money Laundering And Drug Trafficking: A Question Of Understanding The Elements Of The Crime And The Use Of Circumstantial Evidence, Thomas M. Dibiagio
University of Richmond Law Review
Drug trafficking in the United States generates millions of dollars in cash profits daily. The cash generated from narcotics trafficking usually follows one of two distinct paths. Domestically, the profits are converted into usable currency by disguising the association between the cash and the narcotics enterprise. Monies not spent domestically are transferred back to the nar- cotics source or drug cartel to be enjoyed by the drug traffickers and to provide operating capital for the enterprise. This conversion and transfer process has become known commonly as money laundering.
Taking The Sizzle Out Of The Frye Rule: Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Opens The Door To Novel Expert Testimony, Kimberly Ann Satterwhite
Taking The Sizzle Out Of The Frye Rule: Daubert V. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Opens The Door To Novel Expert Testimony, Kimberly Ann Satterwhite
University of Richmond Law Review
In Frye v. United States, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia affirmed a trial court's exclusion of lie detector test results on the ground that such tests had not been "generally accepted" by the scientific community. The Frye rule, or "general acceptance" standard, quickly became the dominant test for the admission of scientific evidence. Decided in 1923, Frye governed evidentiary decisions in a majority of federal circuits for the next seventy years. The adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence in 1975, however, prompted several judges to question the validity of Frye. Since the enactment of the …