Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- DNA (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Race (2)
- AEDPA (1)
- Adjudication (1)
-
- Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1)
- Arson (1)
- Assault (1)
- Biological (1)
- Blood (1)
- Capital (1)
- Confession (1)
- Confrontation (1)
- Counsel (1)
- Crime (1)
- DUI (1)
- Daubert (1)
- Death (1)
- Death sentence (1)
- Destruction (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Earl Washington (1)
- Eligibility (1)
- Escape (1)
- Evidentiary (1)
- Ex parte (1)
- Exculpatory (1)
- Exonerated (1)
- Exonerating (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Overhauling Rules Of Evidence In Pro Se Courts, Andrew C. Budzinski
Overhauling Rules Of Evidence In Pro Se Courts, Andrew C. Budzinski
University of Richmond Law Review
State civil courtrooms are packed to the brim with litigants, but not with lawyers. Since the early 1990s, more and more litigants in state courts have appeared without legal counsel. Pro se litigation has grown consistently and enormously over the past few decades. State court dockets are dominated by cases brought by unrepresented litigants, most often in domestic violence, family law, landlord-tenant, and small claims courts.
Yet, the American courtroom is not designed for use by those unrepresented litigants—it is designed for use by attorneys. The American civil court is built upon a foundation of dense procedural rules, thick tomes …
Innocent Suffering: The Unavailability Of Post-Conviction Relief In Virginia Courts, Kaitlyn Potter
Innocent Suffering: The Unavailability Of Post-Conviction Relief In Virginia Courts, Kaitlyn Potter
University of Richmond Law Review
This comment examines actual innocence in Virginia: the progress it has made, the problems it still faces, and the possibilities for reform. Part I addresses past reform to the system, spurred by the shocking tales of Thomas Haynesworth and others. Part II identifies three of the most prevalent systemic challenges marring Virginia's justice system: (1) flawed scientific evidence; (2) the premature destruction of evidence; and (3) false confessions and guilty pleas. Part III suggests ways in which Virginia can, and should, address these challenges to ensure that the justice system is actually serving justice.
Criminal Law And Procedure, Marla G. Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
Criminal Law And Procedure, Marla G. Decker, Stephen R. Mccullough
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
Efforts To Improve The Illinois Capital Punishment System: Worth The Cost?, Thomas P. Sullivan
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
Depositions For Discovery: The New Virginia Rule, J. Westwood Smithers
University of Richmond Law Review
Important amendments to its Rules, effective April 1, 1961, were recently adopted by the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Perhaps the change of most interest to trial lawyers was the revision of Rule 3:23 relating to D'epositions and Discovery in Actions at Law.