Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Evidence law (2)
- Presumptions (2)
- Admissibility of evidence (1)
- Advisory Committee notes (1)
- Burden of persuasion (1)
-
- Burden of proof (1)
- Civil cases (1)
- Codification (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure Advisory Committee (1)
- FRE Rule 301 (1)
- FRE Rule 401 (1)
- FRE Rule 402 (1)
- FRE Rule 403 (1)
- Federal model (1)
- Instructions to juries (1)
- Jury instructions (1)
- Permanent Rules Advisory Committee (1)
- Presumed fact (1)
- Privileges (1)
- Probative value (1)
- Relevancy (1)
- Symposium (1)
- Uniform Rules of Evidence Rule 301 (1)
- Wyoming Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
An Essay On The Determination Of Relevancy Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
An Essay On The Determination Of Relevancy Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Publications
The scope of the general definition of "relevant evidence" in the Federal Rules of Evidence is ambiguous. It is unclear whether Congress, for instance, intended that certain issues be considered legislatively determined or that those issues rest within the discretion of the courts. There is also some uncertainty over the definition's applicability to several types of evidence--particularly undisputed facts such as those that provide background information or are judicially admitted.