Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Accounting Law (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Admiralty (1)
- Agency (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
-
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Animal Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Economics (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Dickerson V. United States: The Case That Disappointed Miranda's Critics--And Then Its Supporters, Yale Kamisar
Dickerson V. United States: The Case That Disappointed Miranda's Critics--And Then Its Supporters, Yale Kamisar
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
It is difficult, if not impossible, to discuss Dickerson v. United States intelligently without discussing Miranda, whose constitutional status Dickerson reaffirmed (or, one might say, resuscitated). It is also difficult, if not impossible, to discuss the Dickerson case intelligently without discussing cases the Court has handed down in the five years since Dickerson was decided. The hard truth is that in those five years the reaffirmation of Miranda’s constitutional status has become less and less meaningful.
In this paper I want to focus on the Court’s characterization of statements elicited in violation of the Miranda warnings as not actually “coerced” …