Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Constitutional Law (2)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms (1)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Mental Disorders (1)
- Mental and Social Health (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Philosophy of Mind (1)
- Privacy Law (1)
- Psychiatry and Psychology (1)
- Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Exclusionary rule (3)
- Mapp v. Ohio (3)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
-
- Attorney General's Task Force on Violent Crime 1981 (1)
- Book review (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Damages (1)
- Discovery (1)
- Evidence law (1)
- Fifth (5th) Amendment (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Illegal police conduct (1)
- Investigative error (1)
- Involuntary confessions (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Minnesota (1)
- New Jersey v. Portash (1)
- Personal privacy (1)
- Personal records (1)
- Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy (1)
- Police (1)
- Psychiatric evidence (1)
- Scientific Evidence (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Constitutional Limitations On Obtaining Evidence For Scientific Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli
Constitutional Limitations On Obtaining Evidence For Scientific Analysis, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Search And Seizure Of America: The Case For Keeping The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Search And Seizure Of America: The Case For Keeping The Exclusionary Rule, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Twenty years ago, concurring in Mapp v. Ohio (1961), Justice William 0. Douglas looked back on Wolf v. Colorado (1949) (which had held that the Fourth Amendment's substantive protection against "unreasonable search and seizure" was binding on the states through the due process clause, but that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule was not) and recalled that the Wolf case had evoked "a storm of controversy which only today finds its end." But, of course, in the twenty years since Justice Douglas made that observation the storm of controversy has only intensified, and it has engulfed the exclusionary rule in federal …
Testimonial Immunity And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: A Study In Isomorphism, Peter Lushing
Testimonial Immunity And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: A Study In Isomorphism, Peter Lushing
Faculty Articles
This Article accepts and will develop the Court's isomorphic theory of immunity and privilege, and will show why Portash is nonetheless correct in result. A case for a broadened view of the privilege, partially because of the availability of testimonial immunity, will be made. Apftlbaum will be shown to be incorrect in result. This Article will also analyze the problem of immunized testimony and perjury by inconsistent statement, a problem faced once by the Court but left unresolved. Finally, this Article will discuss the constitutional requirements of an immunity statute, and consider an immunity case presently pending before the Supreme …
Manual Of The Law Of Evidence, Geoffrey Bennett
Manual Of The Law Of Evidence, Geoffrey Bennett
Journal Articles
Reviewing: Phipson & Elliott, Manual of the Law of Evidence. 11th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell. 1980. 376 pp.
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Business Papers Rule: Personal Privacy And White Collar Crime, John S. Applegate
The Business Papers Rule: Personal Privacy And White Collar Crime, John S. Applegate
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Failed Explanations And Criminal Responsibility: Experts And The Unconscious, Stephen J. Morse
Failed Explanations And Criminal Responsibility: Experts And The Unconscious, Stephen J. Morse
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Light-Hearted Thoughts About Discovery Reform, John W. Reed
Light-Hearted Thoughts About Discovery Reform, John W. Reed
Other Publications
I am delighted to be here among friends from various settings and associations over the years. Having been unable to arrive until late last evening, I am in a poor position to offer useful commentary on what has been said here. But no matter-that is not my assignment. You have heard enough words of wisdom for one weekend. My pleasant assignment is to offer some "light-hearted" comments on discovery reform. I hope they do not prove to be "light-headed" as well.
Estelle V. Smith: The Constitutional Contours Of The Forensic Evaluation, Christopher Slobogin
Estelle V. Smith: The Constitutional Contours Of The Forensic Evaluation, Christopher Slobogin
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In Estelle v. Smith,' the United States Supreme Court recognized for the first time that an evaluation of a criminal defendant by a mental health professional may implicate both the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The issues raised in Estelle are significant not only for the legal profession but also for those in the mental health professions who perform "clinical" evaluations for the criminal courts. Estelle involved the case of Ernest Smith, who was sentenced to death by a Texas jury in 1974. Prior to trial, the judge ordered a psychiatrist, Dr. Grigson, …
How We Got The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule And Why We Need It, Yale Kamisar
How We Got The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule And Why We Need It, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Why the continuing storm of controversy over the exclusionary rule? Why the deep and widespread hostility to it? I think a recent law office search case, because it arose in a setting so unlike the typical search and seizure case, furnishes a clue. In O'Connor v. Johnson, St. Paul police obtained a warrant to search an attorney's office for business records of a client suspected of making false written statements in applying for a liquor license. The attorney happened to be present when the police arrived. Holding on to his work product file, which contained some of the records sought, …
Federal Habeas Corpus And The Mapp Exclusionary Rule After Stone V. Powell, Philip Halpern
Federal Habeas Corpus And The Mapp Exclusionary Rule After Stone V. Powell, Philip Halpern
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.