Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Negligence (2)
- Acceptance (1)
- Baggage carrier (1)
- Bond (1)
- Book of account (1)
-
- Broker (1)
- Caine v. Cleveland (1)
- Carrier (1)
- Character witness (1)
- Commonwealth v. Puntario (1)
- Consent (1)
- Conveyance (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Desert Land Act (1)
- Dominguez v. State (1)
- Dying declaration (1)
- Extradition (1)
- First National Bank v. Mock (1)
- Gaither v. Charlotte Motor Car Co. (1)
- Harrison v. McPherson (1)
- Hinson v. State (1)
- Hot trail (1)
- Hydroplane (1)
- In re Jones (1)
- Injunction (1)
- Innkeeper (1)
- Insanity (1)
- Internal Revenue Law of 1921 (1)
- Interstate rate (1)
- Jones v. Bland (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Assignments- Assignment of an Expectancy - Joseph and James were two of six children. A contract witnessed "that Joseph Snyder has sold to James Snyder one undivided sixth of the real estate owned by the mother, Susan Snyder; to secure said interest to James after her death, the mother unites in the conveyance of said interest The said Joseph warrants and defends the interest from all claims." The contract was signed by Joseph and by the mother. Held, Joseph had no estate which he could convey, and the contract, though made with the consent of the mother, was unenforceable either …
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Admiralty - Workmen's Compensation - Is a Hydroplane a Vessel? - Claimant was employed in the care and management of a hydroplane which was moored in navigable waters. The hydroplane began to drag anchor and drift toward the beach, where it was in danger of being wrecked. Claimant waded into the water and was struck by the propeller. Held, claimant is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, since a hydroplane while on navigable waters is a vessel, and therefore the jurisdiction of the admiralty excludes that of the State Industrial Commission. Reinhardt v. Newport Flying Service Corp. …
Note And Comment, George E. Longstaff, George L. Clark, Edwin D. Dickinson
Note And Comment, George E. Longstaff, George L. Clark, Edwin D. Dickinson
Michigan Law Review
Constitutionality of the LA Follette Amendment to the Internal Revenue Law of 1921 - The United States Senate on November 5, 1921, inserted in the Revenue Act, then before the Senate, a provision that taxpayers in their income tax returns must specify what state and municipal bonds they hold, or else be subject to a penalty of five per cent. That provision was dropped out in conference, but it will come up again, and it is well to look at its constitutionality under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution prohibiting unreasonable searches.