Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Breach (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Cause of action (1)
- Component (1)
- Discovery (1)
-
- Expectation damage (1)
- Fact pleading (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- General Court Rules (1)
- Joinder of claims (1)
- Joint Committee on Michigan Procedural Revision (1)
- Lost profit (1)
- Lost volume (1)
- Michigan Supreme Court (1)
- No contest rule (1)
- On hand (1)
- Out-of-state service statute (1)
- Parochial damage formula (1)
- Saved overhead (1)
- Service of process (1)
- Single general rule (1)
- Subtrahend (1)
- Uniform Sales Act (1)
- Valuation (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
The New Michigan Pre-Trial Procedural Rules-Models For Other States?, Robert Meisenholder
The New Michigan Pre-Trial Procedural Rules-Models For Other States?, Robert Meisenholder
Michigan Law Review
The new Michigan procedural laws are embodied in a revised set of statutes and court rules which became effective January 1, 1963, after a long period of study by a Joint Committee on Michigan Procedural Revision. They abolish an anachronistic distinction between procedures in law and equity, abrogate a scattered, disorganized set of rules and statutes, and create a unified, coherent procedural system.
A Radical Restatement Of The Law Of Seller's Damages: Michigan Results Compared, Robert J. Harris
A Radical Restatement Of The Law Of Seller's Damages: Michigan Results Compared, Robert J. Harris
Michigan Law Review
Conventional doctrine does not address itself directly to the choice among valuation techniques, although the various parochial damage formulae give some clues. Underlying this series of articles is an assumption that the doctrine makes more sense when restated in valuation terms. These articles involve an effort to restate in such terms one sector of expectation damage law-the part that governs cases in which plaintiff is a "seller."