Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Evidence (2)
- 404(b) (1)
- :) (1)
- :P (1)
- ACLU (1)
-
- Abatement (1)
- Abuse of discretion (1)
- Additional evidence (1)
- American Civil Liberties Union (1)
- Android (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate court (1)
- Appellate judges (1)
- Appellate rulings (1)
- Aracely Rodman (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitration award (1)
- Attenuation doctrine (1)
- Attorney's fees (1)
- Batson/edmonson (1)
- Berghuis v. Thompkins (1)
- Bifurcation (1)
- Burden of persuasion (1)
- Burden of production (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Caste (1)
- Challenges for cause (1)
- Character evidence (1)
- City of Keller v. Wilson (1)
- Clarification orders (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Judicial Federalism And The Appropriate Role Of The State Supreme Courts: A 20-Year (2000–2020) Study Of These Courts’ Interest Evaluations Of The Fruits And The Attenuation Doctrines, Dannye R. Holley Mr.
Judicial Federalism And The Appropriate Role Of The State Supreme Courts: A 20-Year (2000–2020) Study Of These Courts’ Interest Evaluations Of The Fruits And The Attenuation Doctrines, Dannye R. Holley Mr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
The current composition of the United States Supreme Court increases the probability that the Court will be more likely to side with the government with respect to identifying, evaluating, and reconciling the interest of the government versus those of the people when issues of “policing” reach the high court. This opens the door for state supreme court to independently assess individually and collectively these seemingly competing interests and potentially provide greater protections to the interest of the people.
This Article is a twenty-year study of dozens of state supreme court decisions made during the period of 2000–2020. The decisions focused …
Restoring The Presumption Of Innocence: Protecting A Defendant’S Right To A Fair Trial By Closing The Door On 404(B) Evidence, Aaron Diaz
St. Mary's Law Journal
Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Evidence to govern evidentiary procedures and “eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay.” In criminal cases, for example, Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) seeks to prevent prosecutors from improperly introducing a defendant’s past misdeeds. Nevertheless, prosecutors often attempt to introduce a defendant’s past misconduct to suggest that a defendant has a propensity to commit crimes, which is improper character evidence. Unsurprisingly, 404(b) is one of the most litigated evidence rules and has generated more published opinions than any other subsections of the Rules. And despite efforts to amend Rule 404(b), the rule has remained virtually untouched. …
Standards Of Review In Texas, W. Wendell Hall, Ryan G. Anderson
Standards Of Review In Texas, W. Wendell Hall, Ryan G. Anderson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Hearsay In The Smiley Face: Analyzing The Use Of Emojis As Evidence, Erin Janssen
Hearsay In The Smiley Face: Analyzing The Use Of Emojis As Evidence, Erin Janssen
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Filming The Police: An Interference Or A Public Service, Aracely Rodman
Filming The Police: An Interference Or A Public Service, Aracely Rodman
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming.
Authentication And Identification Under Article Ix Of The Texas Rules Of Evidence., Olin Guy Wellborn Iii
Authentication And Identification Under Article Ix Of The Texas Rules Of Evidence., Olin Guy Wellborn Iii
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Exclusion Of Depositions From The Jury Room: An Anachronism In Texas Rule 281., George H. Spencer Jr.
Exclusion Of Depositions From The Jury Room: An Anachronism In Texas Rule 281., George H. Spencer Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.