Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (2)
- Expert Evidence (2)
- Scientific Evidence (2)
- Abuse (1)
- Addicted (1)
-
- Admissibility of evidence. Expert witnesses (1)
- Admissible evidence (1)
- Alcohol (1)
- Baby (1)
- Birth (1)
- Born (1)
- Child (1)
- Cocaine (1)
- Confidential (1)
- Court (1)
- Criminal (1)
- Drug (1)
- Expert (1)
- Expert Testimony (1)
- Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (1)
- Fetus (1)
- Forensic sciences (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Infant (1)
- Intrauterine (1)
- Law (1)
- Legal (1)
- Legal ethics (1)
- Medical (1)
- Mother (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Evidence
Medical Evidence In Cases Of Intrauterine Drug And Alcohol Exposure , Judith Larsen, Robert M. Horowitz, Ira J. Chasnoff
Medical Evidence In Cases Of Intrauterine Drug And Alcohol Exposure , Judith Larsen, Robert M. Horowitz, Ira J. Chasnoff
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of Daubert On The Admissibility Of Behavioral Science Testimony, Henry F. Fradella, Adam Fogarty, Lauren O'Neill
The Impact Of Daubert On The Admissibility Of Behavioral Science Testimony, Henry F. Fradella, Adam Fogarty, Lauren O'Neill
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Impact Of Daubert On Forensic Science, Henry F. Fradella, Lauren O'Neill, Adam Fogarty
The Impact Of Daubert On Forensic Science, Henry F. Fradella, Lauren O'Neill, Adam Fogarty
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Pepperdine Law Review
My focus is on an apparent trend at the intersection of the fields of evidentiary standards for expert admissibility and professional responsibility, namely the eagerness to place more ethical responsibilities on lawyers to vet their proffered expertise to ensure its reliability. My reservations about this trend are not only based on its troubling implications for the lawyer’s duty as a zealous advocate, which already has obvious limitations (because of lawyers’ conflicting duties to the court), but are also based on the problematic aspects of many reliability determinations. To expect attorneys - and this is what the proponents of a duty …